To: fjsva
I still can't see WalMart issuing such a press release without proof it actually was someone from Edward's office that called. Also there is a 2004 date on the PRN page with the press release.
I saw3 that line in the article, but the line in the article about a WM spokeman declining to identify the caller just doen't sit right with me.
If WM did actually issue this release without proof, they have made a HUGE PR mistake and will have a huge mess on their hands.
76 posted on
11/16/2006 6:06:11 PM PST by
Gabz
(If we weren't crazy, we'd just all go insane.)
To: Gabz
Bizarre, hilarious, brilliant regardless if its a hoax or true.
Do a google search on "BENTONVILLE, AR UNITED STATES 10/04/2004" you will find many Wal-mart press releases for different topics with that line in it. Not sure why, but that date does not seem to discount the press release.
It just seems to be a standard part of the press release logo:
78 posted on
11/16/2006 6:20:51 PM PST by
fjsva
To: Gabz
Bizarre, hilarious, brilliant regardless if its a hoax or true.
Do a google search on "BENTONVILLE, AR UNITED STATES 10/04/2004" you will find many Wal-mart press releases for different topics with that line in it. Not sure why, but that date does not seem to discount the press release.
It just seems to be a standard part of the press release logo:
79 posted on
11/16/2006 6:20:53 PM PST by
fjsva
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson