It is a slow day so I got conned into figuring out where lefitst CourtTV was on my tv. It was every bit as good as the CourtTV Duke Hoax message board.
And they were so so PC about Mangum's right to go back to stripping even if she was raped. True enough but those "things" in suits were clearly so neutered that they might as well not allow males or in the CourtTV case former males to comment on rape allegations.
Bah! What a waste of time.
I should probably apologize for the ping!
That's always the left's last bastion of protection for their stupidity and drive to avoid the obvious - "So-and-so has a RIGHT to say (do, or think) what s/he wants to." It's just another straw man defense they use because nobody said they didn't have a "RIGHT" to say or do the thing in question. In this case, Mangum exercised her "RIGHT" to continue stripping which put the lie to her claims to doctors of physical distress and Gottlieb's eleventh-hour epiphany report.
Also notice the "go back to stripping" phrasing. What makes them think she ever stopped?