I have followed the story of little Trenton and if anybody should be sued, is his late mother. She had him in a porn flick, she framed her ex-husband, she lied and refused to help find him. And I saw not a sign of these relatives during searches.
If Nancy can be sued when she is right, so can anyone of us. And that is just wrong.
Do we know for a fact that Trenton was put in a porn flick? If so, wasn't it the husband who made that information public? What a sweetheart. He's real worried about his kid, isn't he? In ten years (assuming Trenton is found alive and well), when he's old enough to understand such things, won't it be nice that his daddy outed his mother so the whole world knows and has seen clips from her porno work?
Neither one of them is a saint, that is for sure. It's probably very likely that the mother spirited Trenton away to keep dad from getting him. But Nancy went down the road that the mother had harmed Trenton, and that doesn't appear to be the case if the newer information and the police theory is right, so Grace was not correct in the theory behind her badgering of the mother. As usual, Nancy shot her mouth off based on very lean pickings of evidence, just like she did in the Duke case.
As I said before, anyone can be sued anytime for anything. Frivolous and malicious cases get filed all the time and even though they are almost always dismissed, the defendant still has to get a lawyer and go through the steps. But this isn't a frivolous or malicious filing.