Skip to comments.
VANITY: Rudy Guliani...a Clinton Liberal
Posted on 11/13/2006 8:11:31 PM PST by Old_Mil
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
To: Old_Mil
Think Rudy's going to go for any of that?Once again, please show me where I have said I want Rudy to be president.
I have not.
So now you are attacking me for something I have not said.
Whereas I am ripping into your sorry arse for what you have said - comparing Rudy to the Clintons. There is no comparison - Rudy, for all his flaws, understands national defense far better than the sorry-assed Constitution Party does, which is more concerned about the process for declaring war than understanding that we ARE AT WAR.
21
posted on
11/13/2006 8:34:54 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Objects in tagline are closer than they appear)
To: Old_Mil
I could care less about refuting anything.
Find a party instead of the GOP that will put candidates up that meet your criteria and stop with the crybaby behavior.
To: dirtboy
Hardly. Those were your own words. Care to dig your hole deeper?
Your party is a dead end. Deal with it.
The original post stated that having the US Army do a job suited for the Salvation Army was bad policy. Somehow, you took from that a comparison between soldiers and members of the salvation army which made them equal. Try reading it again. As far as the Constitution Party, you RINOS nominate Rudy and we'll see how much of the dead end it is.
23
posted on
11/13/2006 8:37:35 PM PST
by
Old_Mil
(http://www.constitutionparty.com/)
To: unsycophant
I could care less about refuting anything.
Find a party instead of the GOP that will put candidates up that meet your criteria and stop with the crybaby behavior.
That's what I figured.
24
posted on
11/13/2006 8:38:28 PM PST
by
Old_Mil
(http://www.constitutionparty.com/)
To: Old_Mil
While I will certainly agree that Rudy is WAY too liberal to be the republican candidate, i feel he would be infinitely better than hillary. Still no conservative, though.
To: Old_Mil
The original post stated that having the US Army do a job suited for the Salvation Army was bad policy.Your own words. Maybe Hitler could have been done in by enough folks from Goodwill. And Tojo with enough Red Cross volunteers.
Any other idiocy you wish to spew on your own vomit vanity?
26
posted on
11/13/2006 8:39:01 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Objects in tagline are closer than they appear)
To: dirtboy
Whereas I am ripping into your sorry arse for what you have said - comparing Rudy to the Clintons. There is no comparison - Rudy, for all his flaws, understands national defense far better than the sorry-assed Constitution Party does, which is more concerned about the process for declaring war than understanding that we ARE AT WAR.
Another unsubstantiated claim. What, exactly, has Rudy done for national defense?
27
posted on
11/13/2006 8:39:17 PM PST
by
Old_Mil
(http://www.constitutionparty.com/)
To: Old_Mil
Another unsubstantiated claim. What, exactly, has Rudy done for national defense?You are truly an idiot. Rudy has been quite supportive of our war efforts. Whereas your party has sought to undermine such consistently.
28
posted on
11/13/2006 8:40:52 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Objects in tagline are closer than they appear)
To: Old_Mil
It's your kind of crap that got us where we are today.
Should I post the pic of the guy who photoshops his teeth?
29
posted on
11/13/2006 8:42:11 PM PST
by
AmishDude
(Libertarians didn't lose it for us. They're losers who work against what they claim to want.)
To: Old_Mil
Who cares what you think? You're an admitted Constipation partyite. You've abandoned your seat at the table voluntarily, so you don't get a say in the GOP primary. Go nominate your own candidate.
30
posted on
11/13/2006 8:43:34 PM PST
by
AmishDude
(Libertarians didn't lose it for us. They're losers who work against what they claim to want.)
To: dirtboy
Specifically, what has Rudy done for our war efforts?
31
posted on
11/13/2006 8:43:46 PM PST
by
Old_Mil
(http://www.constitutionparty.com/)
To: AmishDude
That's the kicker. Rudy is my next-to-last choice for the GOP nominee in 2008 (after McVain).
But I also can see his good points. Unlike this wanker, who is content with .5 percent.
32
posted on
11/13/2006 8:43:48 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Objects in tagline are closer than they appear)
To: AmishDude
So be it. If you guys don't want conservatives at the table, you shall not have them.
33
posted on
11/13/2006 8:44:17 PM PST
by
Old_Mil
(http://www.constitutionparty.com/)
To: AmishDude
You're an admitted Constipation partyite.Yeah, it's a kick in the head for him to call Rudy a RINO when he's not even in the GOP.
34
posted on
11/13/2006 8:44:50 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Objects in tagline are closer than they appear)
To: Old_Mil
Specifically, what has Rudy done for our war efforts?Your party doesn't even support the Iraq War. So what grounds do you have to even ask that question? It would be like the Clintons challenging reformers about ethics.
35
posted on
11/13/2006 8:46:09 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Objects in tagline are closer than they appear)
To: Old_Mil
What, exactly, has Rudy done for national defense? On 9-11, Giuliani was still fighting to keep the Big Apple as a sanctuary city for illegal aliens such as those who were piloting the hijacked planes. He was even willing to defy Congress and the law to do so.
The claims that somehow the guy is strong on defense is like saying that Clinton, the guy who sold our missile targeting secrets to the communist Chinese, was strong on defense because he shot a cruise missile into an empty tent in Afghanistan.
Actually, Giuliani's defense credentials are even worse than Clinton's. All he's got is hot air and empty words on the issue.
To: EternalVigilance; dirtboy
That's what I figured. But dirtboy is so concerned about trying to call out anyone who makes the obvious case that Rudy is a flaming liberal that he can't see the forest for the trees.
At any rate, the evidence is there for people to see. If they act like idiots, nominate, and elect him nobody but they will be responsible for the consequences.
37
posted on
11/13/2006 8:49:57 PM PST
by
Old_Mil
(http://www.constitutionparty.com/)
To: Old_Mil
To: Old_Mil
You left the table. Quit coming back begging for leftovers.
39
posted on
11/13/2006 8:53:35 PM PST
by
AmishDude
(Libertarians didn't lose it for us. They're losers who work against what they claim to want.)
To: Old_Mil
But dirtboy is so concerned about trying to call out anyone who makes the obvious case that Rudy is a flaming liberal Please show me where I said otherwise.
You can't, dipweed. Like I said, I don't want him as the nominee. But comparing him to the Clintons is idiotic. Almost as idiotic as your party's platform regarding the Iraq Salvation Army War.
40
posted on
11/13/2006 8:54:01 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Objects in tagline are closer than they appear)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson