Skip to comments.
VANITY: Rudy Guliani...a Clinton Liberal
Posted on 11/13/2006 8:11:31 PM PST by Old_Mil
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
...It's important that this information is out there. Rudy Guliani is a Clinton liberal and frankly would be no better than the Hildebeest as President. The above material lets you know why.
There are some who have said that you as a conservative should have known what you were voting on the immigration issue for when you cast a vote for GW Bush.
Well, the above information makes it impossible to cast an uninformed one for Rudy. He's a liberal. If you vote for him - either in the primaries or the general election - you are too.
1
posted on
11/13/2006 8:11:33 PM PST
by
Old_Mil
To: Old_Mil
Rudy Guliani is a Clinton liberal and frankly would be no better than the Hildebeest as President. He'd be a little better.
2
posted on
11/13/2006 8:12:33 PM PST
by
jdm
To: Old_Mil
Go piss up a rope.
I do not support Rudy as the GOP nominee in 2008. However, he, at the end of the day, has been tireless in support of national defense, the war against Islamist terrorism, and also worked long and hard to help elect pubbies in the last election. So you can take your Clintonian comparison and stick 'em where your head was a few minutes ago.
3
posted on
11/13/2006 8:13:36 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Objects in tagline are closer than they appear)
To: dirtboy
Well, the first RINO has showed up on the thread. Rudy is a globalist. This means that he will pursue globalist foreign policy solutions. Hillary is a globalist, and she will do the same.
Neither party is actually going to surrender to the Muslims. With either Rudy or Hillary driving, we end up at the same destination.
4
posted on
11/13/2006 8:15:35 PM PST
by
Old_Mil
(http://www.constitutionparty.com/)
To: Old_Mil
Rudy == Rockefeller-style Republican.
It's that type of Republican that lost the election.
5
posted on
11/13/2006 8:16:24 PM PST
by
Bosco
(Remember how you felt on September 11?)
To: dirtboy
Go piss up a rope. Speaking of which....
If Rudy does the same thing with the entire U.S. homeless that he did with NYC's, maybe I can go down the city streets without seeing urine-stained buildings. My local library would also cease to be the local flop house.
6
posted on
11/13/2006 8:18:33 PM PST
by
spall
To: Old_Mil
Well, the first RINO has showed up on the thread. Call me a RINO to my face, jerk.
Like I said, I don't want Rudy to be the nominee. But he's done a lot more for the GOP the last election that you have done in your sorry lifetime.
7
posted on
11/13/2006 8:19:16 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Objects in tagline are closer than they appear)
To: dirtboy
8
posted on
11/13/2006 8:19:31 PM PST
by
Old_Mil
(http://www.constitutionparty.com/)
To: Old_Mil
Ah, a Constitution Party type, eh?
Y'all are opposed to the Iraq War. Like the moonbats I protested Saturday in Philly. It can get hard to tell you apart from them in that regard.
9
posted on
11/13/2006 8:21:28 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Objects in tagline are closer than they appear)
To: dirtboy
If you don't want Rudy to be the nominee, get with the program and oppose that nomination. However, from the sound of things, you're more upset that the truth is being told about a candidate you like.
10
posted on
11/13/2006 8:21:41 PM PST
by
Old_Mil
(http://www.constitutionparty.com/)
To: Old_Mil
I just did.From the safety of your keyboard, big man. Takes no cajones to do that.
Now, what does your wonderous Constitution Party say about the Iraq War?
11
posted on
11/13/2006 8:22:35 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Objects in tagline are closer than they appear)
To: Old_Mil
If you don't want Rudy to be the nominee, get with the program and oppose that nomination. I see you have serious reading comprehension problems. I said I oppose his nomination for Prez in 2008.
However, I also oppose idiots like you comparing him to the Clintons, who never miss an opportunity to bash national security. Capice?
On second thought, I doubt you do.
12
posted on
11/13/2006 8:24:11 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Objects in tagline are closer than they appear)
To: Old_Mil
How convenient for you, to have this information compiled and waiting to be posted.
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: unsycophant
Indeed. Now, can you refute it?
All the Rudyites are coming out tonight.
15
posted on
11/13/2006 8:25:24 PM PST
by
Old_Mil
(http://www.constitutionparty.com/)
To: Old_Mil
If it were to be about Iraq, there are plenty of reasons to oppose a politically correct police action Tell that to the soldiers who have done a great job over there. And the ones ready to go in their place - men I met this weekend. As you, dipweed, downplay them as being Salvation Army types.
You are exhibit A why the Constituion Party is a bunch of losers. And wankers at that.
16
posted on
11/13/2006 8:26:55 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Objects in tagline are closer than they appear)
To: Old_Mil
All the Rudyites are coming out tonight.I'm not a Rudyite. My posting history backs that up.
But you're just a gnat on his backside. You offer nothing in a national security debate, other than acting like Iraq is a job for the Salvation Army. Sorry, but Rudy is far better than your claptrap, as flawed as he is. At least he gets the bigger picture.
17
posted on
11/13/2006 8:29:06 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Objects in tagline are closer than they appear)
To: dirtboy
Tell that to the soldiers who have done a great job over there. And the ones ready to go in their place - men I met this weekend. As you, dipweed, downplay them as being Salvation Army types.
Another reading comprehension problem.
18
posted on
11/13/2006 8:30:38 PM PST
by
Old_Mil
(http://www.constitutionparty.com/)
To: dirtboy
What I offer in the national security debate:
Ban all immigration from Islamic nations. We have been letting 100,000 Muslims into the US legally every year since 9/11.
Build a wall (not a fence, not a virtual fence, not a string of webcams) on the southern border to prevent terrorists (and illegal aliens) from sneaking into this country.
Strike Iran before they get a nuke and strike us.
Think Rudy's going to go for any of that?
19
posted on
11/13/2006 8:32:51 PM PST
by
Old_Mil
(http://www.constitutionparty.com/)
To: Old_Mil
Another reading comprehension problem.Hardly. Those were your own words. Care to dig your hole deeper?
Your party is a dead end. Deal with it.
20
posted on
11/13/2006 8:32:59 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Objects in tagline are closer than they appear)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson