Skip to comments.
The war is over and Linux won
ZDnet ^
 | November 9, 2006
 | Dana Blankenhorn
Posted on 11/12/2006 4:42:14 PM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing
The truth of the assertion is in a chart near the back of the report. It shows that 83% of companies expect to support new workloads on Linux next year, against 23% for Windows. The move is slower for larger enterprises, but the direction is clear. 
At least in the server world, Linux has won.
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.zdnet.com ...
TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: gebait; growth; linux; microsoft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21 next  last
    Kind of makes you wonder what the latest MS-sponsored study says.
To: ShadowAce
2
posted on 
11/12/2006 4:46:09 PM PST
by 
KoRn
 
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
    Wow, what a stupid headline. Is it law that one of these silly articles has to come out every year?
 
3
posted on 
11/12/2006 4:48:22 PM PST
by 
Doohickey
(I am not unappeasable.  YOU are just too easily appeased.)
 
To: Doohickey
    Every time MS is declared dead, it's stock seems to go up. Probably just California dreaming....
4
posted on 
11/12/2006 4:51:52 PM PST
by 
PatrickF4
 
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
    I expect Microsoft to come out with a "WindeX" version soon, then sue the makers of the glass cleaner to force a change in that name. Probably after that they will assert than anything ending in "X" will violate their copyright, to include the cartoon characters Asterix, Obelix, Getafix, Vitalstatistix, and Dogmatix. 
 
5
posted on 
11/12/2006 4:52:24 PM PST
by 
donmeaker
(If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy!" then my ex wife is out of town.)
 
To: PatrickF4
    Every time MS is declared dead, it's stock seems to go up
 
 MS stock just hit yet another year high on Friday.
 And last quarter, the Server division had the highest growth rate, next to the games division, about the 20th straight quarter of double digit growth in the server division. And all that is even before Vista and the New Office ship.
 Yup.
 /sarc Linux has won alright, and Microsoft is really suffering here. /sarc
To: Doohickey
    Wow, what a stupid headline. Is it law that one of these silly articles has to come out every year?
  
  
 Hey, even the fools have first amendment right too. LOL!
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
    It must be a moral victory.
 
To: PatrickF4
    Yet, somehow, the enterprise distros continue to lose market share.
 
9
posted on 
11/12/2006 5:26:55 PM PST
by 
Doohickey
(I am not unappeasable.  YOU are just too easily appeased.)
 
To: donmeaker
    Heh heh, do you remember Mike Roe Soft? 
 
That thing was everywhere now you can barely find three pages of it on google.
 
10
posted on 
11/12/2006 5:35:47 PM PST
by 
Halfmanhalfamazing
(Linux, the #2 OS.  Mac, the #3 OS.  That's why Picasa is on Linux and not Mac.)
 
To: ThomasThomas
    LOLOLOLOL....................................
 
11
posted on 
11/12/2006 5:36:19 PM PST
by 
Halfmanhalfamazing
(Linux, the #2 OS.  Mac, the #3 OS.  That's why Picasa is on Linux and not Mac.)
 
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
    I used to program on an IBM 360/50... in Fortran and Cobol. 
 
We had 32K of Core memory, and joked...Who would ever need that!
 
12
posted on 
11/12/2006 5:42:18 PM PST
by 
donmeaker
(If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy!" then my ex wife is out of town.)
 
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
    
 Mike Rowe, soft.
 
To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...
15
posted on 
11/12/2006 6:44:12 PM PST
by 
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
 
To: rzeznikj at stout
    Train wreck thread alert....
 
16
posted on 
11/12/2006 6:56:23 PM PST
by 
MikefromOhio
(Fear the SWEATERVEST!!!!)
 
To: Doohickey
    In the spirit of stupid - a stupid question: 
 
If Linux is loaded onto an operating Windows machine, the resulting arrangement is dual-boot. When the pc is booted into Linux at the boot selection menu, is browsing with the Linux OS - in every way as secure as if, there was no Windows partition? 
 
Or is it still somehow possible for Windows to be exploited? 
 
To: Cringing Negativism Network
     Or is it still somehow possible for Windows to be exploited? No. If Windows isn't loaded there is no hint of Windows on the machine when Linux is running. Only if the Winfdows kernel is loaded can Windows vulnerabilities be exploited.
 
18
posted on 
11/12/2006 7:53:29 PM PST
by 
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Mathemeticians are machines that turn coffee into theorems.)
 
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
    The article doesn't start out as you indicated, it starts out with "A new IBM-sponsored study..." Not that it wasn't obvious BS based on the title alone. 
 
To: donmeaker
    Everytime Bill Gates quacks, I hear 'slackware'.
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson