Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Prost1
Again not saying casualties are not needed, compared to other wars the toll is not that high, however that dose not mean that the casualties are insignificant as echo talon claimed. Were not sending off tanks to die we are sending our nations future and when one dies no matter how noble the cause it is always significant. I can stomach high casualties. I could take 100,000 or more if it meant victory, however I could not stomach a fellow American calling there deaths insignificant.
115 posted on 11/08/2006 12:03:21 AM PST by spikeytx86 (Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by there fruity little club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: spikeytx86; Echo Talon

"I could not stomach a fellow American calling there deaths insignificant."

Then, I guess, you misunderstand he and I. They are insignificant when compared to the overall struggle, the WAR and the WARS fought for the Freedoms we have.

My father (whose memory is fading) was the 2nd wave at Normandy. 6 months on the front lines! Brest (France), on foot across France to the Battle of the Bulge where he was wounded with shrapnel in the face. 6 Months when life was measured in hours!

He saw more dead than we have suffered! He walked over a hill and saw the remains of Cologne! Only the great Cathederal was standing! The stench of death was everywhere.

Don't get uppidity on numbers. I have numbers. What is important is WINNING!


124 posted on 11/08/2006 12:11:25 AM PST by Prost1 (Fair and Unbiased as always!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson