Skip to comments.
The Lieberman Effect
11/6/06
| vanity
Posted on 11/06/2006 10:25:31 AM PST by cashmere
I have not heard anyone discuss the effect that Liebermans' win will have on make-up and ultimate control of Senate. As an independent candidate what is the result when he wins his seat. Does that not remove 1 seat from the Dem side? Would they not then have to win 8 seats? Thanks for the vanity.
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
1
posted on
11/06/2006 10:25:31 AM PST
by
cashmere
To: cashmere
Lieberman will caucus with the Democrats just as Jumpin' Jim Jeffords did when he became an independent.
2
posted on
11/06/2006 10:26:47 AM PST
by
rhombus
To: cashmere
Holy Joe will go right back to being a rat.
To: cashmere
He has made no secret of the fact that he will caucus with the Dems.
4
posted on
11/06/2006 10:27:54 AM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: cashmere
Joe is not only an independent but a "petitioning Democrat"
He will rejoin the Ds after his victory.
5
posted on
11/06/2006 10:28:10 AM PST
by
Reaganez
To: cashmere
Lieberman announced early on that he would caucus with the Democrats, just as Jim Jeffords once caucused with the Democrats causing the Republicans to lose control.
I wonder if any more like Jeffords are waiting to capture their 15 minutes of fame should the either the house or senate become more evenly divided tomorrow.
Ugly, that could be.
6
posted on
11/06/2006 10:28:28 AM PST
by
Asclepius
(protectionists would outsource our dignity and prosperity in return for illusory job security)
To: rhombus
He's already indicated he's an "Independent Democrat" and will caucus with them.
7
posted on
11/06/2006 10:28:48 AM PST
by
Steven W.
To: cashmere
I have not heard anyone discuss the effect that Liebermans' win will have on make-up and ultimate control of Senate. As an independent candidate what is the result when he wins his seat. Does that not remove 1 seat from the Dem side? Would they not then have to win 8 seats? Thanks for the vanity. It all depends on how he votes for leadership positions, etc.; if he votes like a 'rat, for all intents and purposes he'll be a 'rat. If it's a 50/50 Senate (or even 51/49 either way), don't be too surprised to see the GOP make Lieberman an offer of a nice committee assignment to jump parties, however.
8
posted on
11/06/2006 10:29:33 AM PST
by
kevkrom
(John F'n Kerry's 'apology': "I'm sorry you were too stupid to realize I wasn't calling you stupid.")
To: cashmere
If the Dems score 50 seats, Lieberman will caucus with them and give them control. He can also get a nice Chairmanship for this move.
If the Dems score more than 50 seats, Lieberman will caucus with them and hold onto his seniority and get a decent Chairmanship and nice committee appointments.
If the Dems score less than 50 seats, then he has more incentive to caucus with Republicans, but will still likely caucus with the Dems.
If there is a miracle and the Dems do not score a pickup, Lieberman may stick it to his party and caucus with the Republicans for a good committee selection.
To: cashmere
Lieberamn is stilla democRAT. He has not resigned from the party. He is not presently the party's candidate for Senator.
Once 'RAT always a 'RAT
10
posted on
11/06/2006 10:32:32 AM PST
by
Ouderkirk
(Don't you think it's interesting how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather?)
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
I think we saw his true nature during the 2000 Florida "recount" sham. He is a dirty RAT who sold out any ethics he ever had to help the Democrats steal that election. He carefully twists words and omits information while he presents his "facts." Because he is sneaky and scurrilous, he is the worst type of RAT, in my opinion. He is a soulless leftist loser who would sell his own mother to help a Dem win power. Power at any cost is his mantra.
11
posted on
11/06/2006 10:33:37 AM PST
by
mallardx
To: Asclepius
One person comes to mind...
Lincoln Chaffee
12
posted on
11/06/2006 10:40:35 AM PST
by
Bigh4u2
(Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
To: mallardx
I think we saw his true nature during the 2000 Florida "recount" sham You hit it right on the head! This is a perfect opportunity for the Connecticut Republicans to turn out in full force for their candidate and watch the Democrats split over the other two. It could make enough of a difference for us to win there.
13
posted on
11/06/2006 10:41:10 AM PST
by
Dixie Yooper
(Ephesians 6:11)
To: Asclepius
I'm interested to see if Lieberman remains pro-Israel.
14
posted on
11/06/2006 10:43:04 AM PST
by
Mamzelle
To: Bigh4u2
Lincoln Chaffee I can almost guarantee you that if the GOP can only win 50 seats in the Senate, Chaffee will jump to the Donks in exchange for preferred Committee Assignments.
To: So Cal Rocket
Yep. He's sided with them on more than one occasion.
And he'll do it again.
16
posted on
11/06/2006 11:14:47 AM PST
by
Bigh4u2
(Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
To: cashmere
The MSM doesn't forecast a Lieberman win. It's not in their template.
17
posted on
11/06/2006 11:16:21 AM PST
by
sully777
(You have flies in your eyes--Catch-22)
To: Bigh4u2; So Cal Rocket
We had already the 50/50 situation, and Chafee didn't switch party despite major efforts by the Dims to persuade him.
18
posted on
11/06/2006 1:04:49 PM PST
by
paudio
(Universal Human Rights and Multiculturalism: Liberals want to have cake and eat it too!)
To: paudio
19
posted on
11/06/2006 1:09:11 PM PST
by
Bigh4u2
(Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson