Liefong's claim that he didn't interview Mangum because of her emotional state is a crock. First, it assumes a rape occurred or else she wouldn't be in an emotional state, but the purpose of such an interview would be to make a ground-floor determination as to the credibility of the accusation - did a crime (rape) occur? Did something else occur that made her angry enough to bring the claims? Does she have another motive for making the claim? If the accuser is believeable, and is a credible person, are her claims consistent with the evidence gathered thus far? All of this and more goes into the determination as to whether or not a crime occurred, and LIEFONG NEVER DID THIS. And I think we know why.
According to the ABC site, Part II of Kim's interview will be on the Good Morning show tomorrow. (Tuesday).
"LIEFONG NEVER DID THIS"
...and he took the investigation away from the police department and prevented them from doing it a well.