Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Go Ahead, Put Marks on Me' (GMA Interview w/Kim - DukeLax Ping
ABC News ^ | October 30, 2006 | CHRIS FRANCESCANI and EAMON McNIFF

Posted on 10/30/2006 3:04:46 AM PST by abb

Second Dancer Claims Alleged Duke Lacrosse Rape Victim Said to Bruise Her By CHRIS FRANCESCANI and EAMON McNIFF ABC News Law & Justice Unit

Oct. 30, 2006 — - The second dancer in the Duke rape case has said for the first time that the accuser told her to "go ahead, put marks on me'' after the alleged attack.

Dancer Kim Roberts made the new allegation -- which she has not shared with authorities -- in an interview with Chris Cuomo that will air today on "Good Morning America."

Roberts' allegation comes in the wake of Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong's admission in court last week that he has not yet interviewed the accuser "about the facts of that night."

As she drove the accuser from the March 2006 Duke lacrosse party, Roberts told ABC News the woman was clearly impaired and "talking crazy." Roberts said she tried several different times to get the accuser out of her car.

"The trip in that car from the house … went from happy to crazy,'' Roberts told Cuomo. "I tried all different ways to get through to her.

"I tried to be funny and nice," she continued. "Then I tried to, you know, be stern with her. … We're kind of circling around, and as we're doing that, my last-ditch attempt to get her out of the car, I start to kind of, you know, push and prod her, you know."

Roberts said she told the woman, "Get out of my car, get out of my car."

"I … push on her leg. I kind of push on her arm," Roberts said. "And clear as a bell, it's the only thing I heard clear as a bell out of her was, she said -- she pretty much had her head down, but she said plain as day -- 'Go ahead put marks on me. That's what I want, go ahead.' ''

Roberts said the comments "chilled me to the bone, and I decided right then and there to go to the authorities."

'Weighing on My Heart'

Roberts was not aware at the time of any rape allegations, which were first made by the accuser after police had arrived and taken the woman to a crisis center.

In the interview, Roberts appeared reluctant to talk about her new claim.

"It is something that has been weighing on my heart, and I worry that maybe I won't be called to trial,'' Roberts told Cuomo, as she reached for a tissue. "Because all of, so many of her, so much of [the accuser's] statement differs from mine and I, I might not help the prosecution at all as a witness.''

Roberts became visibly upset as she described the accuser's comments for the first time, at one point stopping the interview.

"I don't even want to talk about it anymore,'' she said.

"Why is it so hard for you to reveal that?" Cuomo asked Roberts.

"Because I think it's gonna make people rush to judgment,'' she replied. "It's gonna make them stop listening. … And I don't like this at all. It's gonna make-- It's gonna make people not listen and I, I'm sure you're probably not even going to play this. It's gonna make people not listen to any other part of the story. It's gonna make people so judgmental, it's gonna solidify their opinions so much, that they're not gonna want to hear the other aspects of the case, which I think are just as important.''

Changes in Roberts' Characterization of the Events

Roberts' attorney, Mark Simeon, said she never shared what she says were the accuser's final comments with police, not realizing their significance at the time. He said she would be willing to take a lie detector test about the new information.

Three Duke lacrosse players -- Dave Evans, Colin Finnerty and Reade Seligmann -- were charged last spring with rape and kidnapping for the alleged attack on the exotic dancer, who had been hired by the men to perform at the off-campus party. All three men have vigorously declared their innocence, inside and outside of court.

Defense attorneys for the players declined to comment on Roberts' remarks.

Durham County District Attorney Mike Nifong did not return a call over the weekend for comment.

One legal expert who has followed the case closely from the start said the new information is a clear blow to an already embattled prosecution team.

"To have witnesses appear on a media program revealing information that the prosecutor doesn't know is stunningly inappropriate,'' said Linda Fairstein, who headed the Manhattan District Attorney's Sex Crimes Unit for more than two decades.

Roberts has proven to be a somewhat unpredictable character in a case with a seemingly bottomless supply of surprises.

She has said consistently that she doesn't know whether or not a rape occurred. But she has characterized the evening's events differently to different people.

On March 20, when police first contacted her a week after the alleged attack, she called the rape allegation a "crock'' and said that she was with the woman for all but "less than five minutes.''

A month later, in an Associated Press interview, she indicated that she believed there had been an attack.

"I was not in the bathroom when it happened, so I can't say a rape occurred -- and I never will. … In all honesty, I think they're guilty. … Somebody did something besides underage drinking. That's my honest-to-God impression."

Then, on June 14, in an interview with National Public Radio, she said she was "unsure'' of how much time passed when the alleged victim got out of her car and went back into the house to get her purse.

"I can never say a rape did or did not occur. That's for the courts to decide. I didn't see it happen, you know? But what I can say is that there was opportunity and it could have happened.''

Simeon told ABC News that she has never shared this new information with authorities simply because she was never asked.

"She hasn't spoken to authorities beyond that very first [March 20] interview that police conducted,'' Simeon said. "She's never met with the DA and has never been called back for a follow-up interview.''

Simeon said she told him she felt her complete story was damaging to both the prosecution and the defense's cases, and as such she believes she may not be called to the witness stand at all.

Fatal Blow to Duke Prosecution?

Nifong, who is seeking reelection next month, stunned defense attorneys in court last week when he said that he has yet to interview the accuser "about the facts of that night.''

"I've had conversations with [the accuser] about how she's doing,'' Nifong said. "I've had conversations with her about seeing her kids. I haven't talked with her about the facts of that night. … We're not at that stage yet.''

The prosecutor made the comment in response to a request from defense attorneys for any statements the accuser has made about the case.

Nifong said that only police have interviewed the accuser, and that none of his assistants have discussed the case with the woman either.

The highly-charged case has sparked an intense, bitter rivalry between Nifong and defense attorneys.

In September, he similarly surprised defense attorneys when he said in court that the attack, which the accuser told police took about 30 minutes, had in fact been only "five to 10 minutes.''

"When something happens to you that is really awful, it can seem like it takes place longer than it actually takes.''

Fairstein, widely considered a pioneer in the field of sex crimes prosecution, said Roberts' allegations do not bode well for either her own credibility or for the district attorney's office.

"In terms of any prosecution, it's troubling when a witness who has been interviewed many times comes up with a completely new statement,'' Fairstein told ABC News. "At some point in a prosecutorial interview, she would have been asked to give them anything she knew, any scrap of information that she had.''

Fairstein told ABC News she was shocked to learn last week that Nifong has yet to interview the accuser.

"That is just against the progress that's been made in this very specialized field,'' she said. "It belies anything a prosecutor would do before making charges. There was no need to rush to the charging judgment in this case. … This whole train should have been slowed down and everybody interviewed before charging decisions. To have witnesses appear on a media program revealing information that the prosecutor doesn't know is stunningly inappropriate.''


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelax; durham; nifong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 501-509 next last
Link to old thread.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1726850/posts?page=348#348

1 posted on 10/30/2006 3:04:50 AM PST by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: abner; Alia; AmishDude; AntiGuv; beyondashadow; bjc; Bogeygolfer; BossLady; Brytani; bwteim; ...

Ping


2 posted on 10/30/2006 3:05:55 AM PST by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Linkback to old thread
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1726850/posts?page=412


3 posted on 10/30/2006 3:06:55 AM PST by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: abb

Was thinking about pinging you and telling you to start a new thread and ping the Duke list. Guess I don't have to now. ;)


4 posted on 10/30/2006 3:13:56 AM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
abb... I don't get why the "comment" is considered so.. so earthshattering.

Kim began prodding and pushing Crystal to get her out of her car, and so Crystal says: "go ahead put marks on me, it's what I want".

I mean, I can take Crystal's comment in so darned many ways. In the deep reach -- Crystal into or being subjected to physical harm, and speaking out. Or, Crystal being sarcastic in response to Kim's "prodding and pushing".

5 posted on 10/30/2006 3:18:19 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alia

The 'marks' would be bona fides. And she was hoping that her pimp would go easy on her when he found out she lost her money and/or got shorted. It's a cinch the pimp would 'put marks on her."


6 posted on 10/30/2006 3:22:36 AM PST by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alia

Crystal needs marks to cry rape.


7 posted on 10/30/2006 3:23:02 AM PST by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

But this then also implies that Kim was "in on the scam" earlier to the "put marks on me" comments. Maybe this will be the "breaking story"? That Kim was in on this hustle?


8 posted on 10/30/2006 3:36:45 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: abb

So, maybe Crystal's comment was sarcastic as in "Put marks on me before my pimp does, 'cus he's gonna"?


9 posted on 10/30/2006 3:37:56 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: abb; xoxoxox

Kim has more to spill, IMO. How big a role did she play in this SETUP?

Who stopped the dancing?
Who first hurled the racial slurs?
Who called 911?

//

Still wondering about that white car.


10 posted on 10/30/2006 3:43:26 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: abb

Mornin' abb. Thanks for the thread and the ping.


11 posted on 10/30/2006 3:44:58 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
The text of K C Johnson's presentation at the ACLU forum

A "Technicality"
12 posted on 10/30/2006 3:52:22 AM PST by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Mmmm, the white car.
Who would be hanging around in an old white car? Maybe if there had been an investigation, we would know!



BTW, I saw on another board that March 24th was the date Nifong instructed Gottlieb and Hinman to report to him. Pretty damned early.

I had been looking for the date. Not sure if it has been posted.


13 posted on 10/30/2006 3:55:14 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: maggief

13 was for you, not myself
(Brain is slow...not used to seeing sun so early)


14 posted on 10/30/2006 3:58:18 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: abb; abner; Alia; AmishDude; AntiGuv; BerniesFriend; beyondashadow; bjc; Bogeygolfer; bonfire; ...
"Go ahead, go ahead, put marks on me."

That is what Kim claims Crystal says in the car.

They says it's a 45 minute interview; more in the next hour!

New thread here!

15 posted on 10/30/2006 4:05:50 AM PST by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: abb

A whore looking for another fifteen minutes of fame!


16 posted on 10/30/2006 4:09:25 AM PST by OldFriend (CNN ~ GIVING THE TERRORISTS A FAIR SHAKE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Remember Crystal's statement? Didn't she say Kim tried to push her out of the car?

I'll have to look for that statement a bit later ...


17 posted on 10/30/2006 4:09:48 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Alia

"I mean, I can take Crystal's comment in so darned many ways."

That's what I was thinking too. In any event, my guess is that this gal didn't come up with the story about being attacked until much later. If she really had been attacked, why wouldn't she have told the other woman immediately?


18 posted on 10/30/2006 4:09:54 AM PST by jocon307 (The Silent Majority - silent no longer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: maggief

She said Kim did push her out onto the street, IIRC.


19 posted on 10/30/2006 4:15:23 AM PST by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: abb
A second important item in this story.

A well-known former prosecutor (Fairstein) publicly criticizing Nifong.

20 posted on 10/30/2006 4:17:00 AM PST by writmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 501-509 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson