Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nifong to give up more documents to defense (DukeLax)
Durham Herald-Sun ^ | October 27, 2006 | John Stevenson

Posted on 10/27/2006 5:00:15 AM PDT by abb

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420421-430 last
To: Howlin
Best guess is that she made a deal with Nifong (the Bond thing) and is just protecting herself. In other words, she doesn't trust Nifong to let her off the hook.

I think we have to wait until after the election until anything of substance happens. Nifong and the Judge are likely two peas in a pod....but the judge could turn UNLESS Nifong has something on the judge. This looks like that old "no honor among thieves" case.

421 posted on 10/30/2006 5:10:05 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle
The indicting grand jury requirement for threshold felonies coupled with no probable cause/pretrial hearing process and no Sixth Amendment protections are what has allowed this to go on this far.

This is something I've kind of wondered about. What about this whole thing made a grand jury think this was worth an indictment?
422 posted on 10/30/2006 5:38:22 AM PST by JamesP81 (Rights must be enforced; rights that you're not allowed to enforce are rights that you don't have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead

Yep justice is deaf and dumb but certainly not color blind in Durham apparently.


423 posted on 10/30/2006 7:34:38 AM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath

Let us know if McCarthy responds to your e-mail.


424 posted on 10/30/2006 7:36:27 AM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I know Kim has some credibility issues, but this gives Fonger even less to work with. I like that.


425 posted on 10/30/2006 7:43:53 AM PST by Sue Perkick (The true gospel is a call to self-denial. It is not a call to self-fulfillment..John MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

It doesn't take much for an indictment. I think about all he had to do was say she claimed to have been raped. And that she had "injuries" consistent with rape. Bada bing bada bang.

Never mind those so called injuries are also consistent with consensual (which we know took place) it makes no difference. Hence the infamous ham sandwich.


426 posted on 10/30/2006 7:49:05 AM PST by Sue Perkick (The true gospel is a call to self-denial. It is not a call to self-fulfillment..John MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

ROFLOL!


427 posted on 10/30/2006 7:54:00 AM PST by Sue Perkick (The true gospel is a call to self-denial. It is not a call to self-fulfillment..John MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: xoxoxox


Oh, Ruth has "Come to Jesus"!


428 posted on 10/30/2006 8:04:53 AM PST by Fido969 ("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead

Difference in culture -- don't get involved -- let the chips fall where they may -- none of my affair -- I tried, but they told me to shut up -- the school told me to stay out of it -- I was never interviewed by the police. Pick any one or more -- they all applied in our case.


429 posted on 10/30/2006 9:33:34 AM PST by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

We'll never know for sure what Liefong said to the grand jury to convince them to indict. The proceedings are entirely secret and there is no transcript. But we can look to the March 16 search warrant affidavit by detective Himan and Liefong's early (false) comments to the media about Mangum's medical report for clues as to the claims he probably made to the grand jury.

Indicting grand juries constructed as they are in NC hear nothing from the defense and, although they have the right (and responsibility) to ask questions and seek more evidence before indicting, they routinely rubber-stamp whatever the DA wants. They basically indict on faith that the prosecutor is telling the truth and has his ducks in a row. They do not test what he says, there is no record of the proceedings, and NC criminal procedure has no subsequent pre-trial hearing process for probable cause review after indictments are handed down and the arrest is made.

So there you have it. Indicting grand juries no longer serve the purpose for which they were formed hundreds of years ago.


430 posted on 10/30/2006 11:54:20 AM PST by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420421-430 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson