To: Froufrou
I heard the boy had multiple infections and it was medically necessary. I can't imagine circumsizing a young man for any other reason. Does the father really want his child to continue in pain? Baffled.
4 posted on
10/26/2006 8:46:01 AM PDT by
timsbella
(Mark Steyn for Prime Minister of Canada! (Steve's won my vote in the meantime))
To: timsbella
I'm baffled, too. Obviously this surgery was recommended by the child's doctor for medical reasons. It seems inhumane to block the surgery.
8 posted on
10/26/2006 9:11:40 AM PDT by
Elyse
To: timsbella
I'm betting that most of those infections could be avoided if they show the boy how to properly clean himself.
9 posted on
10/26/2006 9:12:05 AM PDT by
elc
(Feeling the babywearing love)
To: timsbella
I heard the boy had multiple infections and it was medically necessary. I can't imagine circumsizing a young man for any other reason. Does the father really want his child to continue in pain? Baffled. In this particular instance, I think it's just an example of a control-freak ex-husband wanting to exert his control over his family.
21 posted on
10/26/2006 12:21:57 PM PDT by
Tamar1973
(We can't be brilliant all the time but the path to conservative brilliance starts at Free Republic!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson