Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Shooter 2.5; Admin Moderator; smoketree; mtbopfuyn; Churchillspirit; archy; editor-surveyor; ...
If you can't answer a simple question, you can't answer anything about the assassination. Nothing. You're a waste of bandwidth. Too bad FR has to put up with crackpots like you ever November. This thread should have been locked at the very start.

REPLY

INTERESTING!

If you can't answer a simple question, you can't answer anything about the assassination.

No, you apparently misunderstood. I told you I'm NOT going to answer that question yet, how the first 3 shots "happened." That is EXACTLY how the Warren Commission convinced some pretty erudite people that the single bullet theory is credible. These people bought some pretty silly, rediculous theories (I want to use the word comical but I'll be kind).

The argument goes like this, IF THE SINGLE BULLET THEORY IS NOT TRUE, then you have to have multiple shooters and multiple shots. As I've stated previously, "they" got that wrong too. There were only five shots, the police channel audio analysis clearly showed that :-) . And even if you ignore that audio, then there is plenty to show that Connally was shot 0.7 seconds AFTER President Kennedy's fatal head shot.

Now, many people are willing to conceed their thinking and logic to others, we have Television to thank for that, but NOT all of us. Have you ever heard of Occam's Razor?

Please explain to me WHY we should believe an investigation that simply fails to explain what many people saw? We simply have an investigation where we have DOZENS of people wrong about what they saw and what they heard OR we have an investigation which was fradulant because the Warren Commission was used by the GUILTY MEN (LBJ and HOOVER) to plant the biggest lie in history right on the front page.

We have on one hand an investigation "theory" that supports a lone gunman firing three shots.

On the other side of the equation we have a "theory" that simply says that the final two shots of a "flurry of shots" were spaced 0.7 seconds apart. The first one, fired from somewhere else than the Texas School Book depository, hit President Kennedy in the head at Zapruder Frame number 313. The second shot of the second group hit Governor Connally in the back at Zapruder Frame 325, 0.7 seconds AFTER Zapruder Frame 313.

NOW, do you believe in just wild coincidences like this, that a witness would describe bang-bang for the last two shots? OR as I showed in the still frames in my post that you can see Connally's head snap downward at Z=325, and you find the same information in an analysis of the Dallas Police radio recording? OR do/can you consider a SIMPLE explanation?

The SIMPLE explanation is that Connally was shot in the back at Z=325, 0.7 seconds AFTER President Kennedy's fatal head shot.

You're a waste of bandwidth. Too bad FR has to put up with crackpots like you ever November.

Let's see, FREEREPUBLIC is supposed to be a place where we can let the truth surface with an open forum about ideas and theories, but you advocate censorship that parallels some of the great dictatorships in world history :-)

crackpots like:

Earlier, you called me some other explicatives deleted, thanks for using another one. Are you trying to hurt my feelings?

You see, I've seen some pretty intelligent, serious people buy into this lie, the single bullet theory, and you're just another one. For the FIRST TIME, I am putting what you'd like to call a theory as an alternative idea to the magic bullet theory.

John Connally being shot at Z=325, 0.7 seconds AFTER President Kennedy's fatal head shot, explains MANY of the mysteries shown in clips on the History Channel, the Discovery Channel, the Court TV channel...... For what's approaching one-half century, we've heard BS. The majority of Americans don't believe the Warren Commission, hell, they don't believe much of anything, not even the truth.

You advocate banning this topic from FreeRepublic.com. If I'm right, and I am, this is the most significant topic EVER broken on FREEREPUBLIC, it makes the Dan Rather favorite son story look insignificant by comparison. This is NOT a post that is a shallow "he said, no they didn't" it is instead a post which postulates a simple explanation to one of the biggest "mysteries" in history (hint, it's NOT a mystery, it's a LIE).

IF Connally was hit in the back at Z=325, 0.7 seconds AFTER the fatal head shot to JFK, then you can only conclude that powerful people contolled the investigation. Those people were led by Vice President Johnson and FBI Director FOR LIFE J. EDGAR HOOVER.

It's a simple, easy story to grasp. And there are a lot more facts to support LJB/Hoover, I just introduce the real killers here as I think to UNDERSTAND what happened, you have to consider the power it took to corrupt an investigation of this magnitude. Only the President can pull off someting like this, no one else on Earth has the power.

399 posted on 11/20/2006 10:42:24 PM PST by BILL_C (Those who don't understand the lessons of history are bound to repeat them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies ]


To: BILL_C; Shooter 2.5
Shooter2.5 seems to have great faith in his government.

I wonder if he believes BJ Clinton did not inhale - or have sex with that woman.?

401 posted on 11/21/2006 6:33:32 AM PST by Churchillspirit (We are all foot soldiers in this War On Terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson