Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Alter Kaker
I am not nearly as knowledgeable as Ken Hamm on the subject, so I am not going to try and stand in his place. All I know is that I have heard him debate a number of evolutionists, and well. . . they don't debate him anymore.

A good friend of mine is a microbiology professor, and he believes in the creation account in Genesis. He rarely bothers debating people though. He basically thinks that most so called academics are really not interested in the facts, only their preferred conclusions. I tend to agree with him. But I am a lawyer, and admittedly we tend to see facts that we need to support our conclusions. Anyway, God bless.

105 posted on 10/24/2006 2:38:56 PM PDT by Clump
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: Clump
All I know is that I have heard him debate a number of evolutionists, and well. . . they don't debate him anymore.

Here's why...

Long story short: creationists are whores for publicity; it gives them prestige to further dupe their marks. (These would include the customers to Hamm's little "The-Flintstones-Is-A-Documentary" museum.)

The scientists get nothing out of it but the flim-flam men, like Hamm, get notoriety. They use that notoriety to scam little old ladies out of their pension checks and to push to get school boards to spread their filthy creationist/ID lies to children.

119 posted on 10/24/2006 3:22:41 PM PDT by WildHorseCrash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson