To: unspun
Goodnight, I am off to bed.
Please consider that your argument is circular, and I will respond on the morrow.
"The book is consistent, because everything inconsistent was burned. That proves its literal truth."
30 posted on
10/19/2006 8:53:31 PM PDT by
patton
(Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
To: patton
"The book is consistent, because everything inconsistent was burned. That proves its literal truth." For your morning, since I may not be here: think of a circular orbit around what is actual.
Here's a riddle for you: why do counterfeits exist?
Also, think of maintaining consistency with the words of actual participants and witnesses. (That will help in your Constitutional interpretation, as well.)
31 posted on
10/19/2006 8:58:38 PM PDT by
unspun
(What do you think? Please think, before you answer.)
To: patton
"The book is consistent, because everything inconsistent was burned. That proves its literal truth." Oh, and the other documents are widely available, to this day. No ashes, only paper, vellum, and competing data.
32 posted on
10/19/2006 9:00:20 PM PDT by
unspun
(What do you think? Please think, before you answer.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson