Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: raybbr
Gladly. Quoatation from article, omitted text in italics:

“Public ownership or exclusive use of the property by the public, such as for a public . . . roadway, park, forest, governmental office building, or military reservation; (b) projects designated for public, common carrier, public transportation, or public utility use, including those for which a fee is assessed, that serve the general public and are subject to regulation by a governmental entity; (c) conveying the property to a non-governmental entity, such as a telecommunications or transportation common carrier, that makes the property available for use by the general public as of right; (d) preventing or mitigating a harmful use of land that constitutes a threat to public health, safety, or the environment . . . .”

53 posted on 10/19/2006 3:17:31 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: 1rudeboy

Okay, I don't see where the missing words change the meaning. It still gives the Feds many exemptions in direct contrast to "Protecting the Property Rights of the American People ".


55 posted on 10/19/2006 3:22:51 PM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson