Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'It's Here' Says Microsoft; Launches IE 7 Final, Finally
TechWeb ^ | October 18, 2006 | Gregg Keizer

Posted on 10/18/2006 9:32:00 PM PDT by Eagle9

Microsoft on Wednesday launched the first major update to Internet Explorer in five years, and posted the new browser for Windows XP to a download site.

IE 7, which has was announced in February 2005 by chairman Bill Gates, has been touted by the company as a significant update in the areas of security and usability. The interface has been streamlined and tabs have been added to compete with rivals such as Mozilla's Firefox and Opera's flagship browser. On the security front, IE 7 adds anti-phishing defenses as well as additional features to control ActiveX controls, which historically have been a pain point for Microsoft's browser.

IE 7 for Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 can be downloaded from here.

"It's here, it's final, and we're excited," said Margaret Cobb, the group product manager for the browser.

The most controversial aspect of IE 7 has been Microsoft's decision to push the update to all users who have Automatic Updates enabled. Although users can reject IE 7 -- and continue using their current edition of Internet Explorer -- Microsoft will begin rolling out the browser as a "High priority" update next month. In July, when Microsoft offered up a toolkit to indefinitely postpone IE 7's installation, it justified using Automatic Updates, a mechanism for providing patches to Windows, because of the new browser's security implications.

"We've told enterprise customers to be ready [for IE 7] by Nov. 1," said Cobb. "It won't begin Nov. 1, but they should be ready."

The IE 7 update will also not add to the burden of Microsoft's monthly security patch delivery, scheduled for Nov. 14, promised Cobb. "We won't do it on Patch Tuesday."

Microsoft will also throttle back IE 7's delivery to keep the server load under control, she added. "We're starting with English, and then moving to the localized versions as they come available. At first we'll run it very slow, to a low percentage of users." After assessing the impact, Microsoft will increase the amount of traffic from the servers. "I'll have a 10 a.m. call every day to go over the impact on support or services," said Cobb, who can then order downloads to be scaled back or increased.

It will take as long as three months to deliver IE 7 to all users worldwide. "As each localized language comes online, we'll wait a few weeks after posting it for download before delivering it through Automatic Updates."

Microsoft has made one change late in the game. After IE 7 has installed, it will tell the user which search engine is the current default -- grabbed from IE 5 or IE 6 -- and then ask if they want to make a new choice. The process is similar to, but not identical, to the choice that Windows Vista users will face when they upgrade from Windows XP.

"We added this after RC3," said Cobb. "We're letting users know what engine is the default, and asking them if they want to keep it or do they want to switch. We're also going to be supporting IE 7."

Beginning Thursday, Microsoft will open a free, toll-free support line for IE 7. The help desk will be manned Monday through Friday 5 a.m. to 9 p.m. PDT, and on weekends from 6 a.m. to 3 p.m. PDT.

Internet Explorer's chief rival, Mozilla Corp.'s Firefox browser, is nearing the final release of version 2.0. Currently on Release Candidate 3 (RC3), Firefox 2.0 should make it out the door before the end of the month.

Users who want to block the download and installation of IE 7 through Automatic Updates, as well as the Windows Update and Microsoft Update sites should steer here, where they can retrieve the Internet Explorer 7 Blocker Toolkit.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2little2late; browser; browserwars; computer; firefoxrules; ie; ie7; internet; internetexploiter; lowqualitycrap; microcrap; microsoft; microsuck
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 321-338 next last
To: Eagle9

Thanks for posting that. I saw it on /. this morning and LOL.


101 posted on 10/19/2006 9:01:44 AM PDT by zeugma (I reject your reality and substitute my own in its place. (http://www.zprc.org/))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
If you let Microsoft push something to your corporate network that you haven't tested and verified you deserve to lose your job. That's on you as an admin, not Microsoft who is simply trying to provide a more secure system for home users in spite of all the haters/hackers.

Microsoft is trying to keep their revenue stream going. They could not care less about your security.

 As for "letting" IE on your corporate network,...

We know you don't live in the real world, but out here, you don't necessarily have control over every single desktop, as you have remote locations, and clients that may or may not run the exact same version of windoze that you do. I can't wait for the corporate edicts to start coming down saying "don't use IE 7!"

It's not far off...

102 posted on 10/19/2006 9:05:42 AM PDT by zeugma (I reject your reality and substitute my own in its place. (http://www.zprc.org/))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

Having several thousands systems to maintain definitely qualifies me as real world. Shutting down Windows Update on a corporate LAN is as simple as adding it to your GPO in Active Directory, or requiring a .reg file or secutity template for those without A/D. Speaking of real world you probably don't even know how to perform such trivial tasks due to your refusal to even use Windows, much less support it, leaving your ability to even comment on these subjects being reduced to the equivalent of "spitballs from the back row".


103 posted on 10/19/2006 11:19:28 AM PDT by Golden Eagle (Buy American. While you still can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...

104 posted on 10/19/2006 11:28:01 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

You did see where Secuinia has already issued a security alert on IE7? Luckily, it's not too serious. That has to be a record. :-)


105 posted on 10/19/2006 11:55:23 AM PDT by Salo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: null and void
I've had no problems with XP, it is very nearly as easy to use as OSX.

OTOH my wintel box is is not connected to the outside world, I do all my web stuff on my trusty iMac.


The 98 box doesn't connect to the net these days, and I only hook it up to the network if I'm transferring files back and forth.

So far, I'm happy with winXP operations, unlike the 98, I've had no problems running it for over a week at a time without rebooting. With the 98, it was a daily, if not more often requirement to recover resources.

I figure XP will serve me well into the 2010's before I consider upgrading again.

When something works, why screw with it?
106 posted on 10/19/2006 12:00:27 PM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Eagle9

Either way, I don't plan on running IE7...

The RC's didn't impress me, given what Firefox and Opera already have, and what the devel versions (esp. FF) promises.

It seems like the browser wars forced MS into an upgrade for IE--out of fear of losing marketshare in the browser market.


107 posted on 10/19/2006 12:01:51 PM PDT by rzeznikj at stout (Boldly Going Nowhere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg

Agreed. The only real reason is to add a capability that you actually need.


108 posted on 10/19/2006 12:03:11 PM PDT by null and void (Age and experience -- It makes no sense to get one without the other. - Sundog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Salo

Yeah, I saw that. LOL!


109 posted on 10/19/2006 12:08:20 PM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

You do realize that noone actually believes anything trolls say don't you? Trolls lie as a part of their trollish nature. I don't use windows because life is simply too short for that kind of aggravation.


110 posted on 10/19/2006 12:19:11 PM PDT by zeugma (I reject your reality and substitute my own in its place. (http://www.zprc.org/))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
Thanks for posting that. I saw it on /. this morning and LOL.

I've admitted many times on this forum that my software tech knowledge is limited to just enough for me to get by and do what I need to do. What struck me as odd about that vulnerability in IE 7 is that secunia.com had reported it on April 27, 2006, in IE 6. Even though it is listed as Less Critical, it seems like MS would have gotten around to plugging it before they rolled out their highly touted IE 7.

111 posted on 10/19/2006 12:20:03 PM PDT by Eagle9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Eagle9

"Firefox is my primary browser with Opera being my secondary."

I've been on the prerelease Firefox 2.0 for quite a while now. A lot safer that way, can't afford to be infected for whatever reason.


112 posted on 10/19/2006 12:24:05 PM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
I don't use windows because life is simply too short

Quite obviously you're the troll with zero "real world" experience with this issue then. I strongly suggest you keep that in mind before making any other absurd statements or questioning the expertise of those of us with actual real world experience in this field. If we need any assistance downloading and installing some foreign clone of US products like the Knoppix you use, we'll let you know.

113 posted on 10/19/2006 12:27:23 PM PDT by Golden Eagle (Buy American. While you still can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

It won't be available for XP Sp2?

I really do not want Nanny State Vista spying on everything I do.


114 posted on 10/19/2006 12:28:02 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
The IE 7 betas all had problems on my system. They were unreliable and each time I had to uninstall, hoping to get back to my working IE 6.

That's why they're called "Beta Versions".

115 posted on 10/19/2006 12:29:01 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Karl Rove you magnificent bastard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
also.. if you want a MS PC game in the future you will need and WANT Win Vista because of DirectX 10

What does DX10 bring to the party that wasn't there before?

116 posted on 10/19/2006 12:29:42 PM PDT by TChris (The United Nations is suffering from delusions of relevance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser

"Get this, Vista only allows 2 installs, then its time to pony up more cash. "

And what happens when four and more cores happen with virtual machines?? How many copies do you buy then?


117 posted on 10/19/2006 12:30:15 PM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
It won't be available for XP Sp2?

XP SP2 is the oldest version of XP it will work with.

118 posted on 10/19/2006 12:30:28 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Karl Rove you magnificent bastard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

"IE7 is just as good as FF IMHO"

Somehow I can't seem to get it to install on my Win2000 server. Oh wait, it doesn't install on anything but XP sp2


119 posted on 10/19/2006 12:32:14 PM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
everyones favorite company to bash.

They're a big and easy target to hit.

120 posted on 10/19/2006 12:33:12 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Karl Rove you magnificent bastard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 321-338 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson