Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jezebelle

"Media is willing to say in a meeting Liefong lied but they won't print it?"

I agree. Where is the story about Nifong the hoaxer?
What are they waiting for? There's more than enough now
to write the article.

Anything they write after this is just going to lack
any standing at all--because they kept silent when they could have spoken out--knowing the truth all the while.


233 posted on 10/20/2006 4:38:26 PM PDT by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]


To: CondorFlight

I hope that LB can tell us what their justification was for going ahead and using such derogatory descriptions about the boys and telling one side of the story. Surely the fact that the defense was not yet ready to talk to them isn't their justification for taking the position the boys were guilty and for basically calling them spoiled, rich "white" kids?


234 posted on 10/20/2006 4:47:26 PM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]

To: CondorFlight
They were being criticized for putting the players "mug shots" in the paper in a format guaranteed to have the readers assume they were guilty when someone called out words to the effect of "When will we see Nifong's mug shot in the paper?" This was met with general approval by those in attendance.
245 posted on 10/20/2006 5:23:42 PM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson