[LibertarianSchmoe]

There would be (and is) "debate" if the mountains of evidence were (and is) being willfully ignored. On the other hand, among those who *have* observed and understand the evidence, there is no such debate.

[William Terrell]

No, among those who desire that evolution be true, there is no debate. If a thing is absolutely true, it is clear that it is true in a way that can't be denied by any reasonable man because the evidence is understandable by anyone. Too many have looked into it and rejected it, included some very intelligent men and trained scientists.

If there were any kind of preponderance of evidence at all, there would be no scientists who could argue.