I am getting tired of this nonsense. DNA matches? I am talking about DNA found in the woman. WTF are you talking about?
He is not prosecuting the donor of the DNA found in her, is he? So, again, WTF are you talking about?
I am trying to correct some of your mistakes on this thread. It is apparently a full time job, I dont have time for.
1. First you say that you do not believe that a rape case has ever beeen brought when the rape victim did not testify. I mention one locally. I then pointed out an entire class of such cases I suspect are out there.
2. You respond with a false of topic statement about DNA in this case. I point out the obvious that you were wrong again.
3. You respond with another of topic statement about what Nifong is doing in this case.
You style of discussion is know as bait and switch. I don't really understand, why you just could not say, you are right there are rape cases without a complaining witness.