I'm a little bit conflicted. It has been so many years since I last watched 60 Minutes that I literally do not remember when it was. Maybe 20 years ago...at least 15. I hate to break that streak, but I'm seriously thinking about doing so.
What I find interesting at this point is the negative tone of this article toward the FA and the DA. The paper seems to be plowing the field to prepare for a scathing (or at least negative) report. Does the paper know something, or is it just in the "just in case" mode?
I have a very hard time expecting anything fair and balanced from 60 Minutes. You would never go broke in betting against any use of journalistic integrity where that bunch is involved.
It wouldn't bother me a bit if they did their ususal hit job and did it on Nifong. Even if it were "unfair" he'd deserve it. When someone won't talk to them they say stuff like "Mike Nifong refused our request for an on camera interview" (arched eyebrow). I too am skeptical that they'll do this, but given the strong lax team connection to the NY power centers they just might.