Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: steve-b
Sorry, but you don't get to have it both ways.

No one's talking about two ways.

One can have a fulfilled Western life and have a nuclear family with a minimum of three children, guaranteeing the maintenance of that way of life for the next generation.

It's not an either/or proposition.

You imply that there is no middle ground between irresponsible license and government-mandated breeding programs.

But there is a middle ground: self-respecting people with self-control, choosing to to say yes to the future.

319 posted on 10/10/2006 12:35:11 PM PDT by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake
You're projecting again. It was your own argument that was based on the fallacy of the excluded middle; I simply brought it to its reductio ad absurdum.
334 posted on 10/10/2006 12:44:30 PM PDT by steve-b (It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]

To: wideawake
One can have a fulfilled Western life and have a nuclear family with a minimum of three children

That may be, or it may not. It depends entirely on the individual.

360 posted on 10/10/2006 1:03:34 PM PDT by steve-b (It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson