Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MikeA
That's exactly what I thought. The Party ID breakdown at the 2004 election was 37%D 37%R and 26%I.

Rasmussen, considered the "Gold Standard" Is using a breakdown of 37.0%D, 32.3%R.

http://www.hs.ttu.edu/hdfs3390/weighting.htm

This "poll" isn't even close to either standard.

73 posted on 10/08/2006 7:18:21 PM PDT by ghostmonkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: ghostmonkey

I think Rasmussen may even be off with their numbers. The last party I.D. census I saw about 6 months back had Dems at 35%, GOP 32%. Maybe Rasmussen has more up to date numbers than I do, but the fact still remains NewsWeak is WAY off. Additionally, a national poll has very limited ability to project an outcome for Congressional elections, especially if this poll over-represents population centers in California, New York and Illinois.


74 posted on 10/09/2006 11:29:34 AM PDT by MikeA (Foley has resigned. Bin Laden has not. That is what 's at stake in this election, not some pervert.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson