Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: stultorum

No I wanted to compare the repubs polling in the 2002 midterm as compared to how they are polling today in 2006. i dont remember the news being quite this bad


44 posted on 10/07/2006 2:11:14 PM PDT by sachem longrifle (proud member of the fond Du lac band of the Ojibwa people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: sachem longrifle

And as I told you, it is completly irrelevent. The sample size Dem-Rep-Indy is changed in every Newsweak poll. They NEVER poll the same way. SO a 2002 Newsweak poll that polled 40-35-25 (Demp-Rep-Ind) probably was changed based on these results to be 50-30-20. A couple of weeks ago CBS did at 50-35-15 poll. WHO they poll massively shifts the outcome. Two weeks ago Gallup did a 48-48% poll and found a virtual tie. Polls are NOISE. All that matters is WHO shows up on Nov 7th. Intresting thing. Rassmussen does a daily Presidential approval poll. IT shows almost NO change over the last week.


47 posted on 10/07/2006 2:17:39 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Evil Dooer, Snowflake, Conservative Fundamentalist Bush Bot Dittohead reporting for duty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: sachem longrifle
i dont remember the news being quite this bad

Really? You don't remember when the MSM had to disrregard their own biased exit polls on election night 2002.

49 posted on 10/07/2006 2:22:26 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: sachem longrifle
i dont remember the news being quite this bad

How about the early polls that caused certain MSM networks to call Florida for Gore? A lot of panhandle Republicans went home without voting, leaving the entire US with the Bush/Gore recount debacle.

56 posted on 10/07/2006 2:30:45 PM PDT by Rocko ("Ned Lamont doesn't know anything. You might as well vote for Michael Bolton." -- O'Reilly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: sachem longrifle
Is this the poll you were alluding to?

Here is the poll I was talking about:

Source link: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20061006/pl_afp/uspoliticsscandal_ 061006203242;_ylt=Ap.koQzadfTtLbDRYHgFBTjJ76Mv; _ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl

"Time said its poll suggested a scandal over lurid e-mails and instant text messages sent by former representative Mark Foley (news, bio, voting record) to teenage Congressional pages had "dented" Republican hopes of retaining control of the Senate and House after November 7."

"It said almost 80 percent of the 1,002 people it asked this week were aware of the scandal and believe Republican leaders tried to cover it up. One quarter said it made them less likely to vote Republican in the election."

"Among registered voters, 54 percent said they were more likely to vote Democrat and 39 percent favoured Republican. Time said the margin has jumped 11 percentage points from a similar poll in June."

I just can't trust this poll. To believe it, is to believe that 80% of the people are very naive and uninformed.

59 posted on 10/07/2006 2:35:48 PM PDT by stultorum (dont hire illegal aliens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson