No, you don't... as you continue to prove every time you say anything.
It's not your failure to cite to a passage that supports a particular fact, but my failure to read everything.
Actually...you fail to prove any such "failures" on my part, and it is indeed your failure as pointed out accurately to Kimberly, for you to read or acknowledge anything. This recurring failure of yours to read anything.... corroborated my earlier posting to Kimberly about your feinting and dancing. You tried to disparage without actually coming to grips with the substance, therein.
While you're at it, care to attempt quoting some more from Ronald Reagan which totally undermines your position?
LOL!
The issue on the table (that you are studiously avoiding) is:
. . . somewhere in the Judicial Watch documents is evidence of some amorphous “disavowals” that “have now evidently been debunked.”Please post the evidence below if [chuckle] you have it. Feel free to limit yourself to one instance of the above if you so choose, and say, maybe twenty or thirty words and a link.
I noted your comment about RR, but I don't feel like changing the subject just yet.