Wrong, as usual. As you may or may not remember far enough back, I didn't want to believe it... but remembering the Xlinton escapades...and knowing that where there's smoke there's often fire... I concluded that the smoke certainly warranted Congressional investigation...and appropriate oversight.
It's the CONSTITUTIONAL thing to do. But of course, you know neither our history or Constitution...just like some occupants of the Executive Branch apparently.
Despite their ignorance, I never expected the Executive Branch to deploy a full spread of stalls and point-blank refusals to lawful information requests. The failure to comply anywhere close to fully with the FOIA requests dramatically increases legitimate public concern for the veracity of disavowals that were issued. Disavowals which have now evidently been debunked.
There was sufficient corroboration within even the "sanitized" and "select" documents released supporting the Corsi/Schlafly speculations.
One can only surmise that the withheld documents are even more explicitly (and politically embarassingly) frank in their admissions.
So go fly your black helicopter out of here...and don't let your tinfoil hat get caught in the rotor-blades.
The fact of the matter is, you do not know what is in the released documents . . . feel free to react that I am "Wrong, as usual," when I point out that you are acting as though you know.
"One can only surmise that the withheld documents are even more explicitly (and politically embarassingly) frank in their admissions." No, one cannot. Your inability to see the range of possibilities is what brings forth the comments about black helicopters and tinfoil.
Yep. It's a government conspiracy, alright.