Replies

Secondly, he can have his own opinion, I have my own. And unlike some who are continually harping this NAU BS, opinions on our side of the argument can and will vary and are allowed too.

I'd be interested to get your opinions on what Mr. Ficklin advocates in post #35.

Mr Ficklin is not advocating anything in #35, he is merely pointing out the way it is and that the way it is, is not a plot to "destroy America".

OTOH, the isolationists, populists, and protectionists advocate policies very detrimental to America.

Sure sounds to me like he's advocating in favor of the OBL and what he say sounds eerily familiar to Pastor's testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee . We're just not accustomed to seeing it from those who usually bum rush these threads accusing us of tinfoil hat conspiracies in an effort to silence the discussion. I said a while back that once the FOIA came out, the OBL gang were going to have to regroup and get direction on what to do next.

But I've got to hand it to Ben, he appears to be the first. Apparently they realize that this information, thanks to Corsi, etc., IS getting out and those of us who oppose it will NOT be silenced, despite the attempts at schoolyard bullying. I guess they figure they have no other choice but to ADMIT that they are actually IN AGREEMENT with and support Bush's OBL agenda. As if we didn't know ;-)

I would STRONGLY encourage anyone who hasn't, to get familiar with Pastor, imo, one of the most dangerous threats to our country:

http://www.senate.gov/~foreign/testimony/2005/PastorTestimony050609.pdf