Mexico mega-port plan key to 'NAFTA superhighways'

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | October 7, 2006

[Toddsterpatriot]

Have you ever considered asking someone's help in making your arguments for you?

He'd ask a friend, if he had a friend. Paranoids tend to be loners.

[1rudeboy]

I know it's tangential, but can anyone find support for the assertion that the Commerce Department "refused to hand over about some 80% of the requested documents?" Even Judicial Watch characterizes a portion of the documents it received as "substantial."

[1rudeboy]

Heck, even I could do better despite the tears of laughter running down my face.

[Paul Ross]

Ah, I see.

No, you don't... as you continue to prove every time you say anything.

It's not your failure to cite to a passage that supports a particular fact, but my failure to read everything.

Actually...you fail to prove any such "failures" on my part, and it is indeed your failure as pointed out accurately to Kimberly, for you to read or acknowledge anything. This recurring failure of yours to read anything.... corroborated my earlier posting to Kimberly about your feinting and dancing. You tried to disparage without actually coming to grips with the substance, therein.

While you're at it, care to attempt quoting some more from Ronald Reagan which totally undermines your position?

LOL!

[1rudeboy]

Here's the way it works, Paul. You say something. If you do not back it up, then I ask you to do so. If you refuse to back it up, then either you 1. will not or 2. can not. I have no problem equating the two.

The issue on the table (that you are studiously avoiding) is:

. . . somewhere in the Judicial Watch documents is evidence of some amorphous “disavowals” that “have now evidently been debunked.”

Please post the evidence below if [chuckle] you have it. Feel free to limit yourself to one instance of the above if you so choose, and say, maybe twenty or thirty words and a link.

I noted your comment about RR, but I don't feel like changing the subject just yet.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Trying to get Paul to back up his assertions is like trying to nail jello to a wall.

[1rudeboy]

You and I both know it won't happen, I just like to watch him squirm. When should I start posting Ronald Reagan quotes?

[Paul Ross]

Here's the way it works, Paul. You say something. If you do not back it up, then I ask you to do so.

False. No matter what is said, you merely allege that it isn't "backed up."

The burden of proof is on you to counter. Such as your allegations of the other's "failures" to prove. Again you have no support for that, do you? LOL!

Go miscite Reagan again. And that wouldn't be a change of subject, but appropos of your lack of credibility.

[Toddsterpatriot]

He just hates that Reagan was as optimistic about America as we are. He sounds more like Carter. Nothing but malaise. LOL!

Poor Paul, cognitive dissonance is kicking his ass.

[Paul Ross]

I just like to watch him squirm

Still laughing at you squirming at misciting Reagan! LOL!!!!!!!

[1rudeboy]

School's in, Paul. How about backing-up your assertion that I "miscited" Ronald Reagan? Here, on this thread.

If you can do that, then I know I can teach you to give me evidence of just one "disavowal" that is now "debunked." School's out.

[1rudeboy]

My #551 will send him into brain-lock.

[Paul Ross]

He just hates that Reagan was as optimistic about America as we are.

Oh really. That's a new twist, and dispositively disproved, since I helped get him elected and you two were no where to be seen. And I have yet to see any optimism from you...just mental delusions and denial complexes. And delusions are not optimism. And you besmirch Ronald Reagan with your mental illnesses.

[Toddsterpatriot]

And I have yet to see any optimism from you..

Really? Prove it.

[1rudeboy]

OMG, I forgot! Please, please, please do not post the entire thread and ask me to find the "miscite" myself! [hoot]

[Toddsterpatriot]

That's a new twist, and dispositively disproved, since I helped get him elected and you two were no where to be seen.

OMG, you're not Paul Ross, you're Paul Craig Roberts!

[Toddsterpatriot]

since I helped get him elected

Nice job, now we know who to blame for Reagan losing Minnesota. Twice!!

That's just the kind of work we've come to expect of you.

[Paul Ross]

School's in, Paul. How about backing-up your assertion that I "miscited" Ronald Reagan? Here, on this thread.

here and hereRudy, you have a very short memory with all the debunkings of you pertaining thereto in the intervening posts # 32, 33, 34, 35, 37...

You and your "stake-holders" arguments. Pretty telling where you are really coming from. And you were taken to school....and ran away squirming..."letting (someone else) channel Reagan..."

[caresistance]

The enlightened few, Hitler got large crowds.

[1rudeboy]

I asked you to do it here, Paul. If you are going to open a new line of argument as a distraction, then bring it here. Post some evidence that I miscited Reagan. You want to talk about "stakeholders?" Proceed.