Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: theBuckwheat

NT 3.1 was supposed to be OS/2 3.0--IBM was to develop version 2.0.

But the collaboration between MS and IBM fell apart, with MS continuing to develop Windows. IBM continued to work on OS/2, but it never took off aside from a small and loyal niche market.

So, MS took out the OS/2 API and much of the IBM code--replacing it with the Windows API and their own code. Technically it was clean-sheetede because MS wrote a ton of new code and put it around the new NT kernel, which MS implemented.


69 posted on 10/05/2006 8:25:22 AM PDT by rzeznikj at stout (Boldly Going Nowhere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: rzeznikj at stout

It is interesting how this history is discovered and recalled piece by piece, as if M/S doesn't care too much about it.


70 posted on 10/05/2006 9:37:41 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson