As you may remember, our discussion was about the reason for the old "R-month" thing about oysters that dates back to the 1930's and your "evidence" for this is something that the government health services put out during the 1980's....you are seriously out of synch. time-wise.
Your major point was that water temps were the culprit and mine was that run-off contamination was the bad guy.
In reality, almost all of the closures (to shell-fishing) in area waters were caused by flooding, run-offs (from heavy rains) and the associated decrease in salinity (big factor) and they happened during periods of cooler water temperautres (60's as opposed to 80's).
Please answer this simple question: If water temperatures being too high is the problem, then what is the temperature that is considered to be "too high" that you talk about?
Please don't try to divert the subject (too warm waters = cause of bacterial blooms, yes or no) with trivia that evades the point.
My original point was that the old "R-month" thing about oysters was based on lack of decent refrigeration on the boats harvesting oysters in the pre-60's and yours seems to be that the "R-month" ban in the 1940's and 1950's was, instead, based on a government report from the 1980's.....WOW..how did those fortune-tellers pull that one off?