Just answer 2 questions, did the Dallas man die of vibrio v.? If he didn't why was the article about v.v. linked to the story?
My response was totally about the myth of "month with an 'R' in it" question and absolutely nothing else, so anything else you try to build upon that = "straw men".
You were the one that proclaimed water temps that were too high as the reason for the old "R month" myth and it is simply not true.
My posts had nothing to do with whatever killed the guy in Dallas because I have no knowledge of it except from what I have read.
My response to you centered around your proclamation that the "R-month" thing was all about water temperature and I tried to illustrate to you that this was not the case at all and history backs me up.
I don't want to play the old game where you change the argument in the middle of the game when the old one crashes.
The bacterial "blooms' were due to flood run-offs and were totally unrelated to water temps.
If you are going to respond to me, please make the response come reasonably close to the comments of mine that you are criticizing.
If you have to try and alter the original discussion to look good and dodge the original question, then go ahead....have fun.
Our original divergence of opinions happened over: They come from too warm water, norm, just like the old saying about the 'r' months.
and instead of responding to being being wrong about this, you want to go elsewhere. I can't blame you for a typical human response. It is like when the libs, when caught in a flasehood, suddenly want to "move on" and alter the discussion to something (anything) else.