We all knew that he HAD the opportunites, but just DID NOT go after bin Laden, or anyone for that matter. The question is WHY didn't he.
There are some other threads today that bring up Clinton's desire for the igNobel Peace Prize.
He wants to join the ranks of Arafat, Carter, etc.
Terrorists and boobs.
What a legacy.
Okay, Carter's really after-the-fact, in terms of Clinton's aspirations. But some of those posts pointed
out that if Clinton went after terrorists, the weenies in Norway wouldn't deign to award
him their valuable, but otherwise laughable, "prize".
I think he quite seriously, subconsciously, just did not care.
You see, the clintoons loathed the military.
To go after terrorists, you have to use the military, and continue doing it for a while.
case in point, prez Bush.
Warfare against a broad enemy like terrorists is not some little podunk operation that is over in a few months-
no it means getting your hands dirty, spending some money, making new enemies, and losing troops in battle.
Clintoon just did not want to have to undertake such a major operation, because of his loathing of the military, and the liberal attitude that America is responsible, and America is to blame for evil people.
Clintoon was doom from the beginning-
when liberals are in office the mess up what works, and ignore the broken things.
I hope to GOD we do not ever have a liberal in the WH while we are fighting terror.