[1rudeboy]

The distinction I was trying to draw is that a "change agent" using the Alinsky Method attempts to get people to accept whatever point-of-view he's trying to promote. As I've stated much earlier on this thread (I believe), I really don't care what you all think . . . I'm here for the laughs. Moreover, I'm not sure the Alinsky Method calls for personal attacks for the same reason. I've engaged in my share . . . so whatever it is I'm doing, it's something else.

And let me repeat before someone goes off on another tangent, my initial contribution to this thread was to remind people of an Act passed by Congress (and signed by the President) in 2002. World Net Daily, for reasons apparent to some and inscrutable to others, neglects to provide this information.

I suppose my question should be: if the implementation of a biometric passport system is some sort of an extra-Constitutional, international conspiracy to erase our borders now, was it then? Or did it only become a conspiracy after Jerome Corsi and World Net Daily got wind of it?

[hedgetrimmer]

I'm here for the laughs

Yeah.....right......LOLOLOL

[Toddsterpatriot]

Or did it only become a conspiracy after Jerome Corsi and World Net Daily got wind of it?

It was a boring conspiracy before. Pumping up book sales suddenly makes it an "End of the world", "No proof is more proof of a conspiracy", conspiracy.

[philman_36]

...to this thread...
So what was your "contribution" supposed to have been be on the other thread?

I suppose my question should be...
Since you've admitted that you're only "here for the laughs" you aren't really expecting answers to your questions, are you? Asking questions would mean that you were serious and interested, and you can't be that 'cause you've already said you aren't.
And you're doing it again...How is this a "Pastor is the Antichrist" thread?

[philman_36]

BTW, concerning #152, implication, cynicism and condescension posing as questions really isn't asking questions.