To: hedgetrimmer; B4Ranch; A. Pole; ALOHA RONNIE; George W. Bush; William McKinley; GOP_1900AD
What is especially interesting to me in all of the SPP documents... is the liberal euphemismistic term of "stake-holders" being employed to describe the U.S. entities permitted inclusion in the policy implementation process.
The U.S. citizen and taxpayer is evidenty not deemed to be a legitimate "stake-holder."
148 posted on
10/02/2006 6:43:22 AM PDT by
Paul Ross
(We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
To: Paul Ross
In dictatorships, citizens and taxpayers are not deemed to be a legitimate "stake-holders." They are the property of the dictator.
149 posted on
10/02/2006 6:52:55 AM PDT by
B4Ranch
(Illegal immigration Control and US Border Security - The jobs George W. Bush refuses to do.)
To: Paul Ross
The U.S. citizen and taxpayer is evidenty not deemed to be a legitimate "stake-holder."
If you are attempting to usurp power and self government from the American people, you surely wouldn't want to include common citizens in the process. |Stakeholders" must be glorified by their business interests or their NGO status to participate. Because the usurpers have established public private partnerships with these entities, they are easier to control that the common citizen.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson