'Shadow' agency to issue N. American border passes

WND ^ | 9/27/06 | WND

[lonewacko_dot_com]

The Department of Transportation, acting through a Security and Prosperity Partnership "working group," is preparing in 2007 to issue North American biometric border passes to Mexican, Canadian, and U.S. "trusted travelers" according to documents released to WND columnist and author Jerome R. Corsi under a Freedom of Information Act request.

"The FOIA documents show the organizational chart and the composition of a 'shadow Department of Transportation' which includes formal membership from Mexico and Canada's Departments of Transportation," asserts Corsi.

"SPP has in effect created a fully-functioning trilateral Department of Transportation which will dictate policy to Mary Peters as soon as she is confirmed to replace Leon Mineta as U.S. secretary of Transportation."

..."Evidently SPP has decided to erase our internal borders with Mexico and Canada," Corsi told WND. "We have no trilateral treaty voted by two-thirds of the Senate that has authorized North American trusted traveler biometric cards to be issued to the citizens of the U.S., Canada and Mexico. Yet this is exactly what the shadow administrative branch created within the Bush administration under the auspices of an SPP working group is doing."

[Paul Ross]

I had never seen anything quite like this document. Yes, it looks like the elites are not going to be satisfied until the wages are reduced to those of Mexico.

Clearly, Robert Pastor is one of them. Notice how the Usual Suspects have suddenly sensed their Holy of Holies is going down for the count, and they suddenly show up in a coordinated fashion to try and ad hominem the thread to death.

Not a scintilla of substance by them on Robert Pastor...or his strikingly key influence and socialist agenda. Nor acknowledgment of his chairing the CFR "Task Force"....no, its all just one man's opinion. Or his status with the North American Forum and the SPP. No, it's just "an opinion."

Roooight! LOL!

Seems to be an "opinion" that was shared by one of the principal partners in the SPP... Vincente Fox....

[1rudeboy]

The first ad hominem on this thread was comment #33, and stands at opposite to your contention that "they suddenly show up in a coordinated fashion to try and ad hominem the thread to death."

[Paul Ross]

Sounds like an "if the shoe fits, wear it" proposition to me.

[Toddsterpatriot]

You should really stick to these conspiracy threads. When actual facts are involved, you don't do very well.

[1rudeboy]

Not sure what you mean by that, but you appear to be arguing that some folks are entitled to use ad hominem arguments and others are not.

[Paul Ross]

You weren't pinged. Yet you wear the shoes anyways. LOL!

I see you must feel you have to defend your buddy socialist Robert Pastor.

[1rudeboy]

Hey! Isn't that an ad hominem? [chuckle]

[Toddsterpatriot]

I see you must feel you have to defend your buddy socialist Robert Pastor.

I think Robert Pastor is one of the few people who is a bigger clown than you. Keep pushing though, you may overtake him.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Did you see the Open Road Tolling on I-88 yet? I hope the Chinese don't discover it, it would make their invasion that much quicker.

[Paul Ross]

Hey! Isn't that an ad hominem? [chuckle]

The CFR's Robert Pastor? One of the architects of the whole scheme? Why, Yes. It is. Of someone with a clear publications track record, with a socialist agenda...and then his appointments to positions to implement same... which you evade. [chuckle]

[1rudeboy]

Open Road Tolling is awesome. My personal record is 94mph.

[Toddsterpatriot]

I used to break 100 between Rt 59 and Farnsworth every day. Haven't done it lately.

[1rudeboy]

I've noticed something popping-up on FR with greater frequency: the notion that it is possible to accuse someone of "evasion" without informing them of what they are evading, or giving them the opportunity to not evade.

[Paul Ross]

I've noticed something popping-up on FR with greater frequency: the notion that it is possible to accuse someone of "evasion" without informing them of what they are evading, or giving them the opportunity to not evade.

I've noticed that your evasions are just like this. Changing the subject, rather than acknowledging the issue you are evading. Then say that "no one gave you an opportunity to not evade." Everyone following ths thread honestly knows that the NAU proponents are in fact clearly at issue, probably most flagrantly, CFR partisans of the idea such as:

Robert Pastor.

Is that pointed reminder for you sufficient for you to "not evade" any longer?

[1rudeboy]

Frankly, no. The best way to see if someone is engaged in evasion is to ask them a direct question. You have yet to do so.

Although I find your presumption that your "opponents" are necessarily in favor of the NAU somewhat peculiar.

[Toddsterpatriot]

The best way to see if someone is engaged in evasion is to ask them a direct question.

Sounds like you're using the Alinsky Method.

[philman_36]

...to this thread...
So what was your "contribution" supposed to have been be on the other thread?

I suppose my question should be...
Since you've admitted that you're only "here for the laughs" you aren't really expecting answers to your questions, are you? Asking questions would mean that you were serious and interested, and you can't be that 'cause you've already said you aren't.
And you're doing it again...How is this a "Pastor is the Antichrist" thread?

[1rudeboy]

Asking questions would mean that you were serious and interested, and you can't be that 'cause you've already said you aren't.

LOL . . . about as "serious and interested" as you are in answering my questions (in #152), apparently. Don't worry, Paul Ross will be by shortly to lecture us on "evasion."

[philman_36]

The best way to see if someone is engaged in evasion is to ask them a direct question. You have yet to do so.
I'm still waiting for answers to my very direct questions. I see now why you wanted to "let it die". Being involved in two threads at once simply doesn't jibe as an excuse any longer.

[philman_36]

Don't worry, Paul Ross will be by shortly to lecture us on "evasion."
Perhaps you need that input...I don't. I know all too well how you evade questions.
Like this one from me earlier...
So what was your "contribution" supposed to have been on the other thread?

Did your eyes just glaze over when you read that?
I have to keep reminding myself that you're here for laughs and reply accordingly...