[I want to know]

Here is the second affidavit concerning the telephone survey. The name of the person giving the affidavit is redacted. It is three pages in slideshow format.

http://www.wral.com/news/9914586/detail.html?qs=;s=1;w=837

[maggief]

Thanks for the link.

Let me get this straight regarding polling affidavit #2 ...

Polled on 9/02/06

Gives DETAILED affidavit on 9/21/06

Unfamiliar with Duke LAX case, doesn't watch news because of influence on his/her children

Just happened to watch FOX News on 9/21/06, and just happened to catch report that Nifong's wife was polled

Called Nifong's office, talked to Wilson, offended the survey was conducted by DEFENSE ATTORNEYS.

Can't now be an impartial witness, was convinced by pollster they were innocent.

Doesn't want name released for fear they will be harassed by the media and DEFENSE ATTORNEYS.


Guess it's okay to be harassed by Nifong & company. Can you smell AGENDA?

What bullsh!t.

[JLS]

Look in the link at screening question number 3. Certainly Mrs. Nifong knows that she is not eligible to serve on the jury of a case her husband is prosecuting. So she lied to the survey company. That of course is not illegal, but seems to be a family trait.