To: antiRepublicrat
Yes, I remember them. I like this one in that it's a general purpose socket. Anyone can come up with anything to put in there.It will be interesting to see if anyone can come up with some good FPGA chips to take advantage of this.
11 posted on
09/21/2006 2:47:31 PM PDT by
zeugma
(I reject your reality and substitute my own in its place. (http://www.zprc.org/))
To: zeugma; All
Decentralizing the processing of specific tasks increases through-put. . .
Just like a decentralized government with limited central powers governs best.
12 posted on
09/21/2006 2:51:39 PM PDT by
Mr. Jazzy
(God Bless the United States of America and all that defend her hard earned freedom!)
To: zeugma
I should have
googled before I posted.
Check this out:
To achieve stellar system performance, Advanced Micro Devices has opened its processor socket interface as part of the just released Torrenza platform to allow companies like DRC (Santa Clara, Calif.), Chicago-based XtremeData and others to develop and deploy application-specific coprocessors to work alongside AMD64 processors in multisocket processor systems. The coprocessors plug directly into an empty CPU socket and can be dynamically reconfigured, thus permitting users to change logic configurations to better match the algorithms that need acceleration.
13 posted on
09/21/2006 2:53:05 PM PDT by
zeugma
(I reject your reality and substitute my own in its place. (http://www.zprc.org/))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson