Wrong - clearly you know little about logic (Darwinist seem to be against logic and philosophy)
A = deliberate
B = accidental
C = random
notA = B
B = C
Therefore
notC = A
I don't think you are going to be able to dig yourself out of this hole - but you are welcome to try. You stated "equivocation fallacy" - explain the fallacy
This is so amazing - you are trying to argue deliberate is not the opposite of random. Do you own a dictionary?
deliberate - purposeful, willful, intentional, premeditated
random - without definite aim, purpose, method, or adherence to a prior arrangement
Dimensio, you are pretty much making a fool out of yourself - in light of the definition, are you going to retract your statement or continue defending an indefensible position?
Dimensio says Natural Selection is neither random or deliberate - so what is it? (this should be fun)
Semi-random?
Structured random?
Dimensio, does Natural Selection make the Hawk eat?
Dimensio, does Natural Selection exist outside the mind of man?
Dimensio, in the Natural World, does Natural Selection exist?