[Dimensio]

Natural Selection is not driving the hawk therefore Natural Selection is an observation of many points of data, not a force or structure.

Natural selection is the end-result of the actions of the hawk. You are asserting that a pattern requires a deliberate process. You are simply wrong.

Natural selection is not 'an observation of many points of data'. Natural selection would occur even with no individuals observing and recording the events.

IF you think Natural Selection follows a pattern - state the pattern - although I am not too optimistic you will actually try.

The pattern has been stated. You have attempted to dismiss the stated pattern by claiming that the pattern was not the result of deliberate action to fit a pattern. There is no basis for your restriction, however, so your dismissal is faulty.

[Last Visible Dog]

Natural selection is the end-result of the actions of the hawk.

BINGO!!! END-RESULT, not a force that makes things happen

That is what I have been saying all along.

You are asserting that a pattern requires a deliberate process.

If it is not "deliberate" then it is random - thank you for supporting my position.

You are simply wrong.

It would not be an evo debate without the Darwinist Victory Dance (tm)