My point is that Chapman is saying he was committing crimes in mexico, but no charges were ever filed against Chapman in mexico, and no mexicans ever came forward to claim they were raped by him in mexico.
He was a wanted fugitive from justice in the United States, and I'm glad we have an extradition treaty with Mexico that allowed us to get him back and put him in jail.
I don't know why the pro-chapman people can't get off labelling the pro-law people as being "pro-luster". I haven't seen a SINGLE post on this subject anywhere on FR where someone said Luster was not guilty, or should be freed, or he wasn't worth capturing, or ANYTHING to defend Luster for the crimes he committed and was sentenced for.
I was just pointing out that I don't get my facts from bail-jumpers on cable entertainment shows.
Ok no point taken. Dog should have appeared for his hearing in Mexico. He didn't and will have to face his charge there. But in Mexico what he was charged with was( according to that show) a misdemeanor. I don't know if that is correct. If Luster had been raping women in Mexico why would the Mexicans bother to charge him as he is going to spend a long time in jail here in the USA. I don't think a misdemeanor should be an extraditable crime to Mexico. But that of course is just my opinion. I think there are more people who have committed worse crimes then the Chapmans to extradite.
Heres some links I went to make sure I wasn't just getting my info from a bail jumper on TV.
http://www.crimelibrary.com/criminal_mind/sexual_assault/andrew_luster/14.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Luster In this one it says there was GHB in his room which is also called the date rape drug. So why did he have it?