She's hot and the guy was 17 for gawd sakes. When I was 17 I was FAR from a virgin. Plus did I mention she is hot?
"When I was 17 I was FAR from a virgin. Plus did I mention she is hot?
"
I wasn't a virgin at 17, either, but my girlfriends were also high school students, not teachers.
Who cares if she's "hot." Teachers should not be having sex with students. It's that simple.
"When I was 17 I was FAR from a virgin" So what you are saying was that you went to a lot of Star Trek conventions when you got tired of playing D and D all night.
She is a babe, however.
And a lot of male pedophiles are studs, rather than drooling nose-pickers. Thank you for voicing the opinion that sexual attractiveness exculpates pedophiles.
The kid is indeed old enough to have a sex drive, but not mature enough to realistically weigh the consequences. That is why we have the term minors the law recognizes that young people are ready for some responsibilities but not all responsibilities. Here's a concept you may have never considered. Maturation occurs gradually and privileges and the accompanying responsibilities are earned incrementally rather than precipitously.
Still looking for a victim here...
"She's hot and the guy was 17 for gawd sakes. When I was 17 I was FAR from a virgin. Plus did I mention she is hot?"
So we should give a pass to teachers who engage in this activity when they meet a certain criteria. Huh?