Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: abb
I guess I am missing something here? The DA has not talked with the 3 center employees to this date, as reported. Does the DA even have possession of these notes? The DA has said there was only a log sheet from the center, so maybe they do not know about these notes, and therefore do not have them? The defense is the one who made the discovery of these notes, since they interviewed the employee. If this all true, then why ask the DA to produce something they do not have?

However, if the DA does have them, because this employee told the defense they were turned over to the DA, then the DA is in a big heap of trouble because a copy was to have been turned over to the defense months ago. I would hate to think what would happen if the DA destroyed these notes?

39 posted on 09/19/2006 9:23:05 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rawhide

The defense is demanding the notes from Nifong because they know he is lying and hiding exculpatory evidence. This is just one more bit of pressure on him to come clean.


48 posted on 09/19/2006 11:10:59 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: rawhide

A proper and thorough investigation would have included interviewing all employees who had any contact with Mangum or an opportunity to observe her while she was at Durham Access.

The only tack Nifong can take is "I believe her so there's no need to interview people" in order to avoid evidence of her lies.


323 posted on 09/26/2006 5:31:29 PM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson