To: Nathan Zachary; Aetius; Alamo-Girl; AndrewC; Asphalt; Aussie Dasher; Baraonda; BereanBrain; ...
"
More likely that they were destroyed at the same time as the mammoths were, about 5,000 years ago.
They were covered by the rapid freezing and formation of these glaciers during the eruption of the fountains of the deep.
Woolly mammoths were not Arctic elephants. They are simply hairy elephants, not fury elephants, and elephants simply cannot survive in an Arctic environment." I have to agree, all arctic animals have dense, oily fur. The region could not have been frozen if any bare skin was exposed. Just another of the thousands of cases of evidence presented as favoring evolution that in reality demolishes it.
17 posted on
09/15/2006 3:25:45 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
To: editor-surveyor
all arctic animals have dense, oily fur.
Maybe that's why they were hanging around the oilsands... ;')
21 posted on
09/15/2006 3:44:16 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(updated my FR profile on Saturday, September 2, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: editor-surveyor
Wow that is amazing!
And all the evidence coming in now days is these creatures were very fast frozen (within 6 hours?) and stayed frozen till now.
Amazing too like the dinosaur bone found (supposedly millions of year old) and yet still carries detectable and visible traces of organic tissue matter.
Thanks for link.
W.
22 posted on
09/15/2006 3:53:13 PM PDT by
RunningWolf
(2-1 Cav 1975)
To: editor-surveyor
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson