Posted on 09/15/2006 9:10:14 AM PDT by ParsifalCA
In an blockbusting EXCLUSIVE interview on Dateline NBC, correspondent Matt Lauer sat down with Debra Lafave, the 23 year-old teacher who had sex with a 14 year-old boy on several occasions which made national headlines.
For some ungodly reason, NBC decided this was a groundbreaking story that needed to be told to America. I have one question…
Why is Debra Lafave on television?
There have been notable people who have earned the right to recognition. Sport’s heroes, movie stars, business and religious leaders, respected politicians and cultural groundbreakers have all proven worthy of the media attention paid to them. That is why we feel we know Michael Jordan, Jennifer Anniston, Donald Trump, Reverend Billy Graham, John McCain and Simon Cowell. They have been talented, colorful, daring, mesmerizing, dynamic, blessed and outrageous! But, they have not broken the law, are not mentally ill and do not continue to lie and be in denial about their irresponsible behavior... [more at CaliforniaRepubic]
(Excerpt) Read more at californiarepublic.org ...
One who is truly "sensitive" realizes that too. :^)
But being sensitive to what brings your partner maximum satisfaction covers all bases. Intimate knowledge allows one to understand the points of arousal and makes satisfaction easier.
The man is so much easier to please little time is needed. Women require much more consideration and study. They are far more complex in this area. Until a man learns how to control his climax he is unlikely to be a good lover because of the difference in time of arousal to climax between men and women. This makes the Debbie Does the Boys case so much stranger if actual intercourse is involved. A fourteen year old would probably be done before Debbie was even started, at least the first time.
IF his morals were that well developed then he would not have had sex with her.
14 year old boys are a LOT different than 14 year old girls. Anyone that says differently is pretty much a willfully naive fool that is not using his/her brain to observe the real world around them.
LOL .... thanks for the humor
Which is pretty strong evidence in itself that she was crazy, stupid or both!
Lol! I'd love to, Naj.....but only if there are no guys allowed! :)
He was serious! >:>
(Now where'd I put my can'o Whoopass? Same drawer with my bloomers, cane and dentures??)
Do we look stupid?
Of course it's no guys allowed >:>
I have to tell you...it was one of the funniest things.
She was working here for a year on a permit, so...she wasn't Americanized. Like having an Aussie on the staff, and we all know, Americans and Aussies get along just fine, so we learned a lot about Australia and vice versa.
Whenever she put all the fingertips on one hand over her mouth and turned red...I was saying "What? What?"
Don't drag me into this mess, C. I'm watching from the sidelines this time. 8^)
>>>The man is so much easier to please little time is needed. Women require much more consideration and study. They are far more complex in this area. Until a man learns how to control his climax he is unlikely to be a good lover because of the difference in time of arousal to climax between men and women. This makes the Debbie Does the Boys case so much stranger if actual intercourse is involved. A fourteen year old would probably be done before Debbie was even started, at least the first time.>>>
In a case like this, it isn't a matter of sexual arousal, physically. She was a giddy 13 year old herself in her mind. That was the excitement, the anticipation, that was 'foreplay' if you will for her. So it's not a matter of how can a 14 year old know what to do in bed, it's the kink and fetish itself that turned her on.
LOL....sounds like you enjoyed your time there.
Yeah, they can all go off and play with themselves while we persue more intellectual matters. Somebody has to save the world from all those disgusting pervs, both male AND female!
No the "lay back" quote was no give away to anything except your ability to read things into a remark which are not there. Women can have sex even if they are not interested in it and can just lay back. In fact, that is how they were taught to tolerate it for centuries when they were told they had to accept the beastly attentions of the male. Men can almost never have sex unless they are interested in it which is why the female appearance plays such a large role in stimulating desire. They cannot just lay back or someone will be disappointed at least in intercourse. Of course, there are other alternatives than intercourse.
It is no secret that women's sexuality can be increased and men like it. One of my wife's favorites was the movie of a dance version of Carmen. Made her hotter than a firecracker yet the male dancer (Spanish guy you being a dancer you may be familiar with the movie) was neither handsome, well built or anything like that. But he could dance.
As to my being out of touch. You have nothing to base such an opinion on and my lady friends would tell you nothing could be further from the truth.
It is also interesting how women on these threads know men beter than,
well...
Men;)
Now if she was only orally performing than it could have taken mere seconds.
Agreed.... :)
I don't think a 14 year old boy having sex with a 23 year old is so awful. Sue me.
All the more reason to see her as being crazy and stupid >:>
I know,
I know....
We gotta make the world a better place (now let me go dig out that Last of the Mohican's DVD >:>)
Gimmee your address and I will ;)
In the mean time,
wanna come over for chocolate martinis and beefcake?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.