To: tylendel
I believe that what Red is trying to say, is that both such a person AND McGreevey are bisexual according to the criteria of the sodomite movement - NOT the criteria commonly held on FR.
To: Ursine_East_Facing_North
Ursine - EXACTLY!! Thanks...
My point was that when it's convenient for the gay recruiting movement, just one single homosexual encounter constitutes bisexuality, if you're otherwise hetero.
And then for the gay apologist movement, when a gay person has sex with the opposite, he is still gay, not bi...
I was trying to highlight the hypocrisy.
Also, I hold no opinion on the biological or social origins of homosexuality.
9 posted on
09/18/2006 4:05:41 AM PDT by
RedRightReturn
(Even a broken clock is right twice a day...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson