>> This anti-masonic movement printed many a long-disproven lie and slander, several of which you have regurgitated here. <<
Name one. The closest I ever came to saying anything bad about the historical freemasons was that they probably emerged from Knights Templar who were prosecuted for war crimes. (I actually meant that the unjust treatment they received probably spawned some of their beliefs, but I didn't actually say that the treatment had been unjust.)
So what lies and slander did I write? Is it a false statement that the liberal court system in the mid-20th century was dominated by free masons?
That's tha pathetic thing about so many of the free masons on this thread. You all shout, "Lies! Slander! Whacko Conspiracists!" without ever bothering to point out what was untrue.
"This anti-masonic movement printed many a long-disproven lie and slander, several of which you have regurgitated here."
You reply:
"Name one."
Your post on this very thread, for example, is one:
"As well as explain why they worship Lucifer (no, it's not actually Satanic; the name means "bearer of light") while bowing before a golden bull."
Being a male descendant of Aaron (or at least a levitical priest, I am a kohanim, both by genetics and name), the "golden bull" reference was a particularly offensive slander.
Your LIE about the Knights Templar committing war crimes has already been refuted by me and the true history indicated yet here you go and lie again.
There isn't even anything in the original court records ( and yes, they did keep records and I've read some of them ) about "war crimes". YOU MADE THAT UP, JUST AS YOU MADE UP THE TINFOIL COVERED/BLACK HELICOPTER GARBAGE USED TO HEAD THIS THREAD.
You also claimed that there were NO Masonic major players, in America, from Washington until FDR.
Then, there is your claim that FDR did what he did, because he was a Mason.