To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This is a good pairing, with IBM intimately aware of both processors due to partnership agreements.
What I like to see is that the symmetric multiprocessor (SMP) capabilities are all on very powerful processors in their own right.
This is technically not a "massively parallel" computer because the processors are not made with parallelism-based architecture. The difference amounts to the granularity of the processes and the ability of each processor to natively support parallel assembler constructs.
To: ConservativeMind
Would be fun to study and use this machine....lots of work to be done to get performance....
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson