Skip to comments.
Police Chief May Lose Job Over Wife's Nude Pics
The Indy Channel ^
| September 6, 2006
| AP
Posted on 09/06/2006 11:21:33 AM PDT by Abathar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201-212 next last
To: Stone Mountain
Specifically he has completely abdicated his moral responsibilities as a husband by permitting his wife to engage in such degenerate behavior.
61
posted on
09/06/2006 11:39:28 AM PDT
by
wideawake
("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
To: Abathar
That's punishment enough. If there's any kindness in that town, they will insist that he spend more time at work.
To: Stone Mountain
Sometimes those go hand in hand.
63
posted on
09/06/2006 11:40:00 AM PDT
by
Abathar
(Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
To: operation clinton cleanup
64
posted on
09/06/2006 11:40:07 AM PDT
by
GulfBreeze
(No one can show me one shred of evidence that atheists even exist.)
To: Stone Mountain
"What has HE done wrong specifically?"
He has been seen riding a moped.
65
posted on
09/06/2006 11:40:20 AM PDT
by
Dixie Yooper
(Ephesians 6:11)
To: Abathar; Lazmataz
I wonder if laz'd hit it?
66
posted on
09/06/2006 11:40:54 AM PDT
by
OSHA
(Lose money FAST playing penny stocks. Ask me how!)
To: Abathar
Doris Ozmun - Internet Hottie!
67
posted on
09/06/2006 11:40:55 AM PDT
by
avacado
To: Dixie Yooper
I don't think the analogy applies in this case. Take a look at the picture.
68
posted on
09/06/2006 11:41:08 AM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Stone Mountain
So tell us more about your addiction Mr. Stone....
69
posted on
09/06/2006 11:41:12 AM PDT
by
GulfBreeze
(No one can show me one shred of evidence that atheists even exist.)
To: avacado
That's so freaking nasty...
70
posted on
09/06/2006 11:41:44 AM PDT
by
GulfBreeze
(No one can show me one shred of evidence that atheists even exist.)
To: Abathar
"Technically, the mayor cannot request an OSBI investigation. However, the district attorney's office can, and officials said the focus of any such investigation would be to determine whether city computers were used for the pictures and if that violates the city's charter."
So the mayor is requesting a criminal investigation that he technically isn't allowed to request based solely upon speculation that the city computers might have been used without even knowing if that would constitute a crime?
Sounds to me like it's the mayor that should be run out of town for abusing his own power.
71
posted on
09/06/2006 11:42:26 AM PDT
by
Moral Hazard
(The "missing links" in evolution are nothing compared to the extraneous links in intelligent design.)
To: avacado
Is that the "Get in mah belly" guy under MM's head?
72
posted on
09/06/2006 11:42:26 AM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Stone Mountain; SpinnerWebb
?And the wives of their employees? And the parents of their employees? And the cousins of their employees? In Oklahoma all 3 of these might be the same person
73
posted on
09/06/2006 11:42:32 AM PDT
by
tx_eggman
(The people who work for me wear the dog collars. It's good to be king. - ccmay)
To: Still Thinking
I would rather be seen riding the moped
74
posted on
09/06/2006 11:42:49 AM PDT
by
Dixie Yooper
(Ephesians 6:11)
To: Abathar
Where's her left hoot? Is it hiding behind the star-spangled fabric? If so, why is it so much smaller than what I think is her right hoot?
75
posted on
09/06/2006 11:42:57 AM PDT
by
Xenalyte
(Can you count, suckas? I say the future is ours . . . if you can count.)
To: wideawake
Specifically he has completely abdicated his moral responsibilities as a husband by permitting his wife to engage in such degenerate behavior.
His wife is a separate person who doesn't need "permitting" from anyone to pose on the internet. And if she doesn't have a problem with it and he doesn't either, I certainly don't. Those pictures disturb you? Don't access them.
I think it's incredibly creepy to fire an employee based on the actions of their spouse, particularly when perfectly legal.
To: tx_eggman
No, that's Ar-Kansas you're thinking of. BTW, did I ever tell you why the DNA sample on Monica's blue dress wasn't damning to x42? It matched everybody in Ar-Kansas!
77
posted on
09/06/2006 11:44:08 AM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: ArrogantBustard
Hubby just stopped by my office. I asked him about your acronym. He said "Come here mama, I'll show you." Moro Islamic Liberation Front - LOL!
78
posted on
09/06/2006 11:44:31 AM PDT
by
Quilla
To: Dixie Yooper
That was my first thought when you posted, too.
79
posted on
09/06/2006 11:44:47 AM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Stone Mountain
I really hate porn and do not want it in my house. However, I agree with you. She is not breaking any laws and she clearly is of the age of consent so where is the problem?
80
posted on
09/06/2006 11:44:55 AM PDT
by
Kimmers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201-212 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson