Hats off to xoxoxox who posted this on the old thread.
To: xoxoxox; maggief; Mike Nifong; abb; Ken H; TommyDale; Howlin; Jezebelle; JLS; Neverforget01
Ping to new article
Abb I know I left alot out, could you ping them in the morning, please?
To: Protect the Bill of Rights
Important points:
AV in subject in at least 5 otherprobes (newspeak for investigation)
Baker wanted to give a presentation to the City Council
I have always thought it strange there was no paperwork for Durham Access. If it is not documented, it did not happen. For all practical purposes, if there is nothing, she was not at DA. Admittedly, I am applying medical standards to the courthouse setting.
It is finally time for the judge to put up or shut up.
To: abb; Alia; AntiGuv; AmishDude; Bogeygolfer; BossLady; Brytani; beyondashadow; bwteim; Carling; ...
DukeLax Ping!
18 posted on
09/01/2006 11:36:31 PM PDT by
Howlin
To: Protect the Bill of Rights
Nifong, Gottlieb, and Linwood Wilson are NOT turning over documents and information required by law?
I can't even feign being shocked anymore.
However, one has to wonder why they are withholding documents?
Why did Nifong give up some of his advantages by agreeing to let in a Judge from another stable?
With all the damaging information to have come out on the prosecution's case - it's hard to fathom that this case could bear anymore hits at this point.
It just doesn't make any sense for Nifong to be resisting by withholding - unless the information is bad news for him and his case.
How long will it take Judge Smith to see what is going on here?
43 posted on
09/02/2006 1:46:30 AM PDT by
Mike Nifong
(Somebody Stop Me !)
To: Protect the Bill of Rights
The DA is probably hoping to have the cases tossed on a technicality, so he can continue stirring up claims that the guys are guilty.
56 posted on
09/02/2006 4:05:10 AM PDT by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
To: Protect the Bill of Rights
According to the defense, Gottlieb, in a typewritten document, said that on April 4, he was asked by a captain to produce a timeline of events for the city manager, Patrick Baker, for possible presentation to the council. The defense wants a copy of that timeline plus a report of the substance of any meetings between or among law enforcement officers, the manager and any council member. IMO, this may be quite interesting since Gottlieb's timeline to Baker would precede any knowledge of Reade's alibi.
To: Protect the Bill of Rights
Mary Mapes and Dan Rather are busy creating all the necessary documents for the prosecution of the Duke players.
64 posted on
09/02/2006 6:33:23 AM PDT by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: Protect the Bill of Rights
the accuser was involved -- as a suspect, witness or otherwise -- in at least five other probes.
Others have speculated that she was a snitch and that is why she was given such a sweetheart deal on the steaing the cab, drunk driving and trying to run over an officer. Here is what we know:
1. The stealing the cab incident could be one.
2. The reporting the husband has having tried to kill her could be a second.
I am not sure of any others. The defense may be fishing here, but it is one way this case can end. If she is a snitch, she won't testify and may not even return to Durham. As a known snitch her life might not be very fun or worth much in Durham, if that is what comes out of the police files.
70 posted on
09/02/2006 7:46:05 AM PDT by
JLS
To: Protect the Bill of Rights
556 posted on
09/08/2006 11:00:02 PM PDT by
Ken H
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson