Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: abb

So, investigators in the Duke case were at the trial standing right next to the defendant-witness?

Were they trying to intimidate him? If not, why ere they there?


152 posted on 08/30/2006 2:58:06 AM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Jezebelle

Indeed, why were they there?

New website. Good links to articles.
http://www.ethicaldurham.com/Home_Page.html
Duke Students for an Ethical Durham


153 posted on 08/30/2006 3:03:38 AM PDT by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

To: Jezebelle

Himan on the left and Clayton on the right: http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2862/372/1600/Mostafa_trial.jpg


154 posted on 08/30/2006 3:20:35 AM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

To: Jezebelle
Why were they there? Let me take a wild guess...haha. Since a Lacross investigator's own notes say that Nifong asked to be notified about the cab driver's arrest, then I surmise that Nifong also wanted to know the details of the trial.

He's a real hands-on guy, isn't he? (Personally, a lot of people, myself included, would like to get some hands on HIM. It wouldn't be pretty.)

156 posted on 08/30/2006 3:24:49 AM PDT by Carolinamom (This is no time to go wobbly. - Lady Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson